From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EED2BC69 for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 01:43:43 +0100 (CET) Received: from pih-relay04.plus.net (pih-relay04.plus.net [212.159.14.131]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l1L0hg9Q000452 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 01:43:43 +0100 Received: from [80.229.56.224] (helo=beast.local) by pih-relay04.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1HJfa8-00027a-60 for caml-list@yquem.inria.fr; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 00:43:40 +0000 From: Jon Harrop Organization: Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd. To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] List not bidirectional? Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 00:37:16 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <8b4c81f0702201458y377c2e81vdd6f0e3eb48cbea@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <8b4c81f0702201458y377c2e81vdd6f0e3eb48cbea@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200702210037.16243.jon@ffconsultancy.com> X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 45DB95BE.001 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; ocaml:01 ocaml:01 frog:98 wrote:01 caml-list:01 caml:02 caml:02 context:04 products:86 ltd:86 things:13 some:14 www:84 used:16 tuesday:18 On Tuesday 20 February 2007 22:58, Henry Lenzi wrote: > This list simply propagates to fa.caml? > Is fa.caml used outside the context of this list? Some people post things to fa.caml only to see no replies. -- Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd. OCaml for Scientists http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/ocaml_for_scientists