From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from discorde.inria.fr (discorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.38]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AF73BC69 for ; Thu, 22 Feb 2007 11:01:08 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp.syd.people.net.au (smtp.syd.people.net.au [218.214.225.98]) by discorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id l1MA15YD002267 for ; Thu, 22 Feb 2007 11:01:07 +0100 Received: (qmail 19868 invoked from network); 22 Feb 2007 10:01:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO coltrane.mega-nerd.net) (218.214.64.136) by smtp.syd.people.net.au with SMTP; 22 Feb 2007 10:01:19 -0000 Received: from coltrane (coltrane [192.168.1.101]) by coltrane.mega-nerd.net (Postfix) with SMTP id A7ED57B6C for ; Thu, 22 Feb 2007 21:01:02 +1100 (EST) Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 21:01:02 +1100 From: Erik de Castro Lopo To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Combinatorics in a functional way Message-Id: <20070222210102.03d39c69.mle+ocaml@mega-nerd.com> In-Reply-To: <45DC58ED.6080103@janestcapital.com> References: <20070221203603.e222647a.mle+ocaml@mega-nerd.com> <20070221134635.GA28981@gaia.cc.gatech.edu> <45DC58ED.6080103@janestcapital.com> Organization: Erik Conspiracy Secret Labs X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.3.0beta5 (GTK+ 2.8.20; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Miltered: at discorde with ID 45DD69E1.001 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; ocaml:01 okasaki:01 cheers:01 wrote:01 caml-list:01 digest:01 functional:02 functional:02 erik:04 erik:04 brian:04 problem:05 indeed:07 suggestions:07 teaching:07 Brian Hurt wrote: > A good, functional, generic solution: Thanks all. There's a whole bunch of really good suggestions there. Its going to take me a while to digest all this and decide which technique best fits my problem. > Okasaki should be required reading. Indeed. Cheers, Erik -- +-----------------------------------------------------------+ Erik de Castro Lopo +-----------------------------------------------------------+ "Do I do everything in C++ and teach a course in advanced swearing?" -- David Beazley at IPC8, on choosing a language for teaching