caml-list - the Caml user's mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jon Harrop <jon@ffconsultancy.com>
To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Interactive technical computing
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 19:34:07 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200703081934.07403.jon@ffconsultancy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070308.152439.98695201.Christophe.Troestler+ocaml@umh.ac.be>

On Thursday 08 March 2007 14:24, Christophe TROESTLER wrote:
> I have written a Gnuplot module that allows that.  Here is the
> compulsory screenshot :)
>
>   ftp://ftp.umh.ac.be/pub/ftp_san/Ocaml-gnuplot.png

Great stuff. Thanks. :-)

> Unless it is open source, I would not use such a product.  Having it
> open source is the only waranty for long term security.  I would not
> develop codes that cannot run 5 years later because, say, you
> unfortunately went to bankruptcy... or you became crazy and ask 10
> times more money... or...

I can't justify the time unless I get to sell something. :-)

> > > Finally, I'd like to note that operator overloading is probably
> > > the single biggest difference between my F# and OCaml code. The
> > > ability to apply + and - to many types, particularly vectors and
> > > matrices, makes this kind of work so much easier.
>
> That would not completely remove the problem of adding some operators
> but I was thinking of a possibly generic solution using Camlp4:
> writing [X.(a + b)] where [X] is a module would become [X.add a b].
> Now for matrices, one still needs + (for matrix addition), * (for
> matrix multiplication) and, say, .* (for scalar product).  So to be
> generic, one needs to be able to specify a set of operators (with
> precedences) and a way to transform an AST of that mini language into
> Caml code (that would possibly allow some optimisations, analysing the
> expression at compile time to reduce de number of intermediate
> matrices allocated).  A slicing notation also needs to be developed,
> say [a.{1, 2:3:7}], as well as a good ASCII pretty printer for
> matrices (they must be bigarrays to be able to use interesting
> libraries).

I don't think you can obtain F#'s brevity/clarity that way because you need to 
affect type inference and macros can't do that.

-- 
Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd.
OCaml for Scientists
http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/ocaml_for_scientists


  reply	other threads:[~2007-03-08 19:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-03-08  1:13 Jon Harrop
2007-03-08  1:49 ` [Caml-list] " Jim Miller
2007-03-08  2:52   ` skaller
2007-03-08  3:00     ` Jim Miller
2007-03-08  3:10       ` skaller
     [not found]         ` <beed19130703071919g1f537f59o93ce06871fba8f3a@mail.gmail.com>
2007-03-08  3:27           ` skaller
2007-03-08  3:36             ` Jim Miller
2007-03-08 21:16               ` Richard Jones
     [not found]                 ` <45F10E90.5000707@laposte.net>
2007-03-09  7:43                   ` Matthieu Dubuget
2007-03-10 14:58                     ` Richard Jones
2007-03-08 12:22             ` Gerd Stolpmann
2007-03-08 14:24               ` Christophe TROESTLER
2007-03-08 19:34                 ` Jon Harrop [this message]
2007-03-08 20:34                   ` Christophe TROESTLER
2007-03-09 10:22                     ` Jon Harrop
2007-03-09 10:45                       ` Christophe TROESTLER
2007-03-08  2:12 ` Erik de Castro Lopo
2007-03-08 12:41   ` [Caml-list] F# Jon Harrop
2007-03-08 11:12 ` [Caml-list] Interactive technical computing Andrej Bauer
2007-03-08 11:59 ` Vu Ngoc San
2007-03-08 12:43   ` Jon Harrop
2007-03-08 21:28     ` Vu Ngoc San
2007-03-09  0:14       ` skaller
2007-03-08 21:26 Robert Fischer
2007-03-09  0:04 ` skaller
2007-03-09 10:06   ` Jon Harrop
2007-03-09 10:25 ` Jon Harrop
2007-03-10 14:55 ` Richard Jones
2007-03-10 22:07   ` Michael Vanier
2007-03-29  0:33     ` Jon Harrop
2007-03-29  8:41       ` Joel Reymont
2007-03-30 11:31         ` Jon Harrop
2007-03-09 13:33 Robert Fischer
2007-03-09 13:49 ` Jon Harrop
2007-03-09 13:54 ` skaller
2007-03-09 14:13 Robert Fischer
2007-03-09 15:21 ` skaller
2007-03-09 17:26 ` Jon Harrop
2007-03-09 18:50 ` Jon Harrop
2007-03-09 14:21 Robert Fischer
2007-03-09 15:35 Robert Fischer
2007-03-09 17:41 Robert Fischer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200703081934.07403.jon@ffconsultancy.com \
    --to=jon@ffconsultancy.com \
    --cc=caml-list@yquem.inria.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).