From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,MISSING_HEADERS autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5B84BC69 for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 15:58:04 +0100 (CET) Received: from furbychan.cocan.org (furbychan.cocan.org [80.68.91.176]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l2AEw3tp023216 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 15:58:04 +0100 Received: from rich by furbychan.cocan.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1HQ31H-000488-00 for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2007 14:58:03 +0000 Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 14:58:03 +0000 Cc: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Interactive technical computing Message-ID: <20070310145803.GB9357@furbychan.cocan.org> References: <1173322347.12230.61.camel@rosella.wigram> <1173323451.12230.77.camel@rosella.wigram> <1173324431.12230.94.camel@rosella.wigram> <20070308211637.GB26279@furbychan.cocan.org> <45F10E90.5000707@laposte.net> <45F11036.1010509@laposte.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <45F11036.1010509@laposte.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: Richard Jones X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 45F2C77B.001 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; 0100,:01 matthieu:01 dubuget:01 ocamlopt:01 dlls:01 ocamlopt:01 unix:01 wrote:01 compile:01 caml-list:01 dll:03 languages:03 guess:04 fri:05 computing:05 On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 08:43:50AM +0100, Matthieu Dubuget wrote: > > Richard Jones a écrit : > >> Putting aside the obvious cultural resistance to using a sensible > >> language for this project, there is one technical hurdle: It needs to > >> compile into a DLL which can be linked to other programs (in C and > >> other languages). I can't generate such code using ocamlopt, at least > >> not without using unsupported out-of-tree extensions. > >> > >> > Could you please give us some details? What kind of extensions? > > I'm mainly producing DLLs with ocamlopt. You're doing this on Windows with ODLL? I want to generate Unix .so files, and as you might guess from my company affiliation, I'm not too worried about Windows :-) Rich. -- Richard Jones Red Hat