From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,SPF_NEUTRAL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id E404CBC6E for ; Mon, 2 Apr 2007 11:15:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from relay1.beelinegprs.ru (mail.gprsrus.net [217.118.66.233]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l329F5a0029032 for ; Mon, 2 Apr 2007 11:15:05 +0200 Received: from relay1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay1 (Postfix) with SMTP id 65F29136DD9 for ; Mon, 2 Apr 2007 13:14:55 +0400 (MSD) Received: from [192.168.0.80] (unknown [172.17.13.79]) by relay1.beelinegprs.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6F3C1369B1 for ; Mon, 2 Apr 2007 13:14:53 +0400 (MSD) From: Michael Nedzelsky Reply-To: MichaelNedzelsky@yandex.ru To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] OCamlAntlr Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 13:14:25 +0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 References: <46105069.9030303@sbcglobal.net> In-Reply-To: <46105069.9030303@sbcglobal.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200704021314.25722.MichaelNedzelsky@yandex.ru> X-SpamTest-Info: Profile: Formal (1108/070328) X-SpamTest-Info: Profile: Detect Hard No RBL (4/030526) X-SpamTest-Info: Profile: SysLog X-SpamTest-Info: Profile: Archiving (2/030321) X-SpamTest-Status: Not detected X-SpamTest-Version: SMTP-Filter Version 2.0.0 [0125], KAS/Release X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 4610C999.001 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; ocaml:01 parser:01 ocamllex:01 ocamlyacc:01 ocaml:01 yandex:98 wrote:01 caml-list:01 implementing:06 apr:06 michael:07 michael:07 although:09 backend:11 definitely:12 On Mon, 2 Apr 2007 04:38 am, Bill Smith wrote: > Is there any interest in an ocaml version of the parser generator > antlr? Presumably it would work along the lines of ocamllex and > ocamlyacc, although I don't really know all that would be involved > implementing such a tool. I have successfully used Antlr in Java, C# and C++ projects. So I think having an Ocaml backend for Antlr is a definitely good idea. Michael Nedzelsky