From: mmottl@janestcapital.com
To: OCaml <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Inlining and code placement
Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 16:29:34 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070503202932.GB12369@nyc-qws-003.delacy.com> (raw)
Hi all,
concerning my email about inlining from a few days ago: it seems that
the majority of differences is not so much due to the inlining level but
due to code placement. This means that playing with the inlining level
beyond some reasonable, small value is likely to not have any strong
impact on the performance of the program.
Markus
next reply other threads:[~2007-05-03 20:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-03 20:29 mmottl [this message]
2007-05-03 20:31 ` [Caml-list] " Markus Mottl
2007-05-03 20:37 ` Joel Reymont
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070503202932.GB12369@nyc-qws-003.delacy.com \
--to=mmottl@janestcapital.com \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).