* Inlining and code placement
@ 2007-05-03 20:29 mmottl
2007-05-03 20:31 ` [Caml-list] " Markus Mottl
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: mmottl @ 2007-05-03 20:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: OCaml
Hi all,
concerning my email about inlining from a few days ago: it seems that
the majority of differences is not so much due to the inlining level but
due to code placement. This means that playing with the inlining level
beyond some reasonable, small value is likely to not have any strong
impact on the performance of the program.
Markus
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [Caml-list] Inlining and code placement
2007-05-03 20:29 Inlining and code placement mmottl
@ 2007-05-03 20:31 ` Markus Mottl
2007-05-03 20:37 ` Joel Reymont
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Markus Mottl @ 2007-05-03 20:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: OCaml
On 5/3/07, mmottl@janestcapital.com <mmottl@janestcapital.com> wrote:
> concerning my email about inlining from a few days ago: it seems that
> the majority of differences is not so much due to the inlining level but
> due to code placement. This means that playing with the inlining level
> beyond some reasonable, small value is likely to not have any strong
> impact on the performance of the program.
(Sorry, this went to the wrong alias, it wasn't intended for the OCaml
mailining list - but isn't that much off topic either ;).
Markus
--
Markus Mottl http://www.ocaml.info markus.mottl@gmail.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [Caml-list] Inlining and code placement
2007-05-03 20:31 ` [Caml-list] " Markus Mottl
@ 2007-05-03 20:37 ` Joel Reymont
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Joel Reymont @ 2007-05-03 20:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Markus Mottl; +Cc: OCaml
Markus,
Do you care to elaborate?
Thanks, Joel
On May 3, 2007, at 9:31 PM, Markus Mottl wrote:
> On 5/3/07, mmottl@janestcapital.com <mmottl@janestcapital.com> wrote:
>> concerning my email about inlining from a few days ago: it seems that
>> the majority of differences is not so much due to the inlining
>> level but
>> due to code placement. This means that playing with the inlining
>> level
>> beyond some reasonable, small value is likely to not have any strong
>> impact on the performance of the program.
--
http://wagerlabs.com/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-05-03 20:37 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-05-03 20:29 Inlining and code placement mmottl
2007-05-03 20:31 ` [Caml-list] " Markus Mottl
2007-05-03 20:37 ` Joel Reymont
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).