From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from discorde.inria.fr (discorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.38]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00122BC69 for ; Fri, 11 May 2007 08:53:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from fiton.bononia.it (fiton.bononia.it [130.186.88.105]) by discorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l4B6rAwf008426 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Fri, 11 May 2007 08:53:11 +0200 Received: from aquarium.takhisis.invalid (fiton.bononia.it [130.186.88.105]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "Stefano Zacchiroli", Issuer "sockmel.bononia.it" (verified OK)) by fiton.bononia.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CCD7142E3 for ; Fri, 11 May 2007 08:53:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: by aquarium.takhisis.invalid (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7688CD4178; Fri, 11 May 2007 08:52:06 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 08:52:06 +0200 From: Stefano Zacchiroli To: Caml List Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Custom operators in the revised syntax Message-ID: <20070511065206.GB1219@takhisis.invalid> Mail-Followup-To: Caml List References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-Miltered: at discorde with ID 464412D6.003 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; zacchiroli:01 syntax:01 0200,:01 syntax:01 camlp:01 ocaml:01 lexer:01 cheers:01 zacchiroli:01 unibo:01 zack:01 zack:01 wrote:01 caml-list:01 define:01 On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 10:55:02PM +0200, Nicolas Pouillard wrote: > Today it's about custom operators. In the original syntax everyone > knows that's easy to define and use custom operators like ++, -->, > >>>, +|, =?=, ... and as many as you want. Not strictly related to your RFC, but while we are at it: any chance to broaden the set of characters accepted for the definition of custom operators, possibly supporting UTF-8? I understand this is a much more involved change and I do not know if your camlp4 related changes affected the ocaml lexer support for non-ascii characters, but someone had to ask this :-) Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli -*- PhD in Computer Science ............... now what? zack@{cs.unibo.it,debian.org,bononia.it} -%- http://www.bononia.it/zack/ (15:56:48) Zack: e la demo dema ? /\ All one has to do is hit the (15:57:15) Bac: no, la demo scema \/ right keys at the right time