From: Christian Stork <cstork@ics.uci.edu>
To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Custom operators in the revised syntax
Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 18:05:16 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070513010516.GB16813@stirner.roentgeninstitut.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6ebe51ce0705121727v1dba74d8ia2690e031d0d8430@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 02:27:34AM +0200, ketti wrote:
> On 5/13/07, Nicolas Pouillard <nicolas.pouillard@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >I've a tiny patch to do that:
> >
> >2 ``List.mem`` [1;2;3]
> >
> >I think that extension harmless, any thoughts?
>
>
> What about: 2 ´List.mem´ [1;2;3] ?
Or:
2 `(List.mem) [1;2;3]
Then you could even have operators with arguments. IIRC this idea (not
this particular syntax) was proposed for Haskell' but wasn't worth the
effort to make work with their current `single-op` syntax. Maybe it's
worth it in this case?
--
Chris Stork <> Support eff.org! <> http://www.ics.uci.edu/~cstork/
OpenPGP fingerprint: B08B 602C C806 C492 D069 021E 41F3 8C8D 50F9 CA2F
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-13 1:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-10 20:55 Nicolas Pouillard
2007-05-10 21:35 ` [Caml-list] " Loup Vaillant
2007-05-10 22:25 ` Nicolas Pouillard
2007-05-11 6:52 ` Stefano Zacchiroli
2007-05-11 13:14 ` dmitry grebeniuk
2007-05-11 14:15 ` Loup Vaillant
2007-05-11 14:37 ` Jon Harrop
2007-05-11 14:46 ` Nicolas Pouillard
2007-05-12 2:48 ` Jon Harrop
2007-05-12 4:40 ` skaller
2007-05-12 4:47 ` Jon Harrop
2007-05-12 5:45 ` skaller
2007-05-12 5:59 ` Jon Harrop
2007-05-12 6:43 ` skaller
2007-05-12 10:22 ` Richard Jones
2007-05-13 15:42 ` Arnaud Spiwack
2007-05-13 16:04 ` ls-ocaml-developer-2006
2007-05-13 20:08 ` Nicolas Pouillard
2007-05-12 9:49 ` Nicolas Pouillard
2007-05-12 10:09 ` Jon Harrop
2007-05-11 14:52 ` Loup Vaillant
2007-05-11 18:32 ` skaller
2007-05-12 4:48 ` Jon Harrop
2007-05-11 18:23 ` skaller
2007-05-11 14:40 ` Nicolas Pouillard
2007-05-11 18:22 ` skaller
2007-05-11 14:36 ` Nicolas Pouillard
2007-05-11 14:47 ` brogoff
2007-05-11 14:51 ` Nicolas Pouillard
2007-05-11 18:25 ` brogoff
2007-05-11 20:37 ` Nicolas Pouillard
2007-05-12 22:54 ` Nicolas Pouillard
2007-05-13 0:27 ` ketti
2007-05-13 1:05 ` Christian Stork [this message]
2007-05-13 10:50 ` Nicolas Pouillard
2007-05-13 5:52 ` brogoff
2007-05-13 7:36 ` skaller
2007-05-13 13:12 ` Jacques Carette
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070513010516.GB16813@stirner.roentgeninstitut.de \
--to=cstork@ics.uci.edu \
--cc=caml-list@yquem.inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).