From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6094BC69 for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2007 10:59:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from furbychan.cocan.org (furbychan.cocan.org [80.68.91.176]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l518x7ma007008 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2007 10:59:08 +0200 Received: from rich by furbychan.cocan.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Hu2yR-0000Yn-00 for ; Fri, 01 Jun 2007 09:59:07 +0100 Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 09:59:07 +0100 To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Comparison of OCaml and MLton for numerics Message-ID: <20070601085906.GA2146@furbychan.cocan.org> References: <5195a210705302250u6a9e5adey4ed857480f9e5cd8@mail.gmail.com> <200705311008.16662.jon@ffconsultancy.com> <5195a210705310222p6aa8482fr70e7bf2b2b631b72@mail.gmail.com> <200705311127.28639.jon@ffconsultancy.com> <465F3E8C.10404@inria.fr> <1180660974.15528.126.camel@rosella.wigram> <465FAF0B.5060700@inria.fr> <1180685367.3417.9.camel@rosella.wigram> <20070601085340.GA29035@furbychan.cocan.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070601085340.GA29035@furbychan.cocan.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: Richard Jones X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 465FDFDB.002 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; ocaml:01 caml-list:01 comparison:04 red:92 mlton:13 same:17 another:24 the:27 jones:32 jones:32 net:67 for:33 rich:65 rich:65 richard:34 Another article on the same topic: http://lwn.net/Articles/82495/ Rich. -- Richard Jones Red Hat