From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from discorde.inria.fr (discorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.38]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8852EBC69 for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2007 03:36:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp.syd.people.net.au (smtp.syd.people.net.au [218.214.225.98]) by discorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id l511aPfC005022 for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2007 03:36:27 +0200 Received: (qmail 13696 invoked from network); 1 Jun 2007 01:36:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hendrix.mega-nerd.net) (218.214.64.136) by smtp.syd.people.net.au with SMTP; 1 Jun 2007 01:36:24 -0000 Received: from hendrix (hendrix [192.168.200.99]) by hendrix.mega-nerd.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 9F4382FE72 for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2007 11:36:18 +1000 (EST) Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 11:36:15 +1000 From: Erik de Castro Lopo To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Comparison of OCaml and MLton for numerics Message-Id: <20070601113615.fd7857e5.mle+ocaml@mega-nerd.com> In-Reply-To: <1180660974.15528.126.camel@rosella.wigram> References: <5195a210705302250u6a9e5adey4ed857480f9e5cd8@mail.gmail.com> <200705311008.16662.jon@ffconsultancy.com> <5195a210705310222p6aa8482fr70e7bf2b2b631b72@mail.gmail.com> <200705311127.28639.jon@ffconsultancy.com> <465F3E8C.10404@inria.fr> <1180660974.15528.126.camel@rosella.wigram> Organization: Erik Conspiracy Secret Labs X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.3.1 (GTK+ 2.10.11; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Miltered: at discorde with ID 465F7819.001 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; ocaml:01 ocaml:01 osx:01 unix:01 wrote:01 wrote:01 slides:01 caml-list:01 optimization:03 clause:03 erik:04 erik:04 comparison:04 usual:06 fixing:07 skaller wrote: > Someone (as usual no URL sorry) wrote a paper roughly titled > 'guaranteed optimisations' which is actually an interesting > perspective on this whole scenario. I found a bunch of slides titled "The Guaranteed Optimization Clause of the Macro-Writer's Bill of Rights": http://www.cs.indiana.edu/~chaynes/danfest/dyb.pdf Erik -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Erik de Castro Lopo ----------------------------------------------------------------- "OSX - because making unix useable was easier than fixing windows." -- from slashdot