caml-list - the Caml user's mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: luc.maranget@inria.fr (Luc Maranget)
To: Yaron Minsky <yminsky@cs.cornell.edu>
Cc: Luc Maranget <luc.maranget@inria.fr>, caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] JoCaml Released.
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 14:47:43 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070604124743.GA16252@yquem.inria.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <891bd3390706040513r398a8415r4d790c6040ed200@mail.gmail.com>

> A couple of questions:
> 
>   - Why is it that JoCaml is a full OCaml distribution as opposed to
>   just a set of libraries plus a syntax extension.  Was there some 
>   particular
>   feature that required hacking the compiler directly, or was it just more
>   convenient to build it that way?

  As far as I know, access to the guts of the compiler is required at
  least for the following two features.

    - Specific typing rules.

    - Pattern matching compilation.
      See the buffer example in the doc for instance
      <http://jocaml.inria.fr/manual/concurrent.html#htoc20>

  Besides, JoCaml is not a full OCaml distribution. JoCaml is a restricted
  OCaml distribution. On the light side, JoCaml compilation is very fast;
  on the dark side, some of OCaml tools are not available, (camlp4, ocamlbuild,
  labltk..)


   
>   - What do you think the future of JoCaml is?  Any thoughts on whether
>   it will be supported in the future, and in particular whether it will get
>   merged back into the OCaml mainline tree?

    I can only wish a bright future to JoCaml :)

    Our team will support JoCaml.

    Merging JoCaml into the OCaml mainline tree is another story. We have
    no plans for that at the moment. Let us wait a bit for JoCaml success
    to deprecate OCaml thread libraries.

-- Luc


  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-06-04 12:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-06-04  8:57 Luc Maranget
2007-06-04  9:38 ` [Caml-list] " Joel Reymont
2007-06-04  9:53   ` Luc Maranget
2007-06-04 12:13 ` Yaron Minsky
2007-06-04 12:38   ` skaller
2007-06-04 13:57     ` Oliver Bandel
2007-06-04 15:19       ` Luc Maranget
     [not found]       ` <873b17zu1o.fsf@mitre.org>
2007-06-06  8:18         ` Oliver Bandel
2007-06-06  9:00           ` Oliver Bandel
     [not found]             ` <46667CE2.8020502@tsc.uc3m.es>
2007-06-06  9:31               ` Oliver Bandel
2007-06-06  9:40                 ` Jon Harrop
2007-06-06 11:02                   ` polycontextural logic (Re: [Caml-list] JoCaml Released.) Oliver Bandel
2007-06-06 13:15                     ` Oliver Bandel
2007-06-06 15:11                     ` Lukasz Stafiniak
2007-06-08 14:26                     ` Oliver Bandel
2007-06-04 12:47   ` Luc Maranget [this message]
2007-06-04 12:52     ` [Caml-list] JoCaml Released Joel Reymont
2007-06-04 12:38 ` Jon Harrop
2007-06-04 12:59   ` Luc Maranget

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070604124743.GA16252@yquem.inria.fr \
    --to=luc.maranget@inria.fr \
    --cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
    --cc=yminsky@cs.cornell.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).