From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD52ABC0A for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 23:02:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp.syd.people.net.au (smtp.syd.people.net.au [218.214.225.98]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id l55L2Nlo020048 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 23:02:25 +0200 Received: (qmail 4364 invoked from network); 5 Jun 2007 21:02:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hendrix.mega-nerd.net) (218.214.64.136) by smtp.syd.people.net.au with SMTP; 5 Jun 2007 21:02:22 -0000 Received: from hendrix (hendrix [192.168.200.99]) by hendrix.mega-nerd.net (Postfix) with SMTP id E83422FEA0 for ; Wed, 6 Jun 2007 07:02:20 +1000 (EST) Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 07:02:20 +1000 From: Erik de Castro Lopo To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] jocaml vs camlp3l Message-Id: <20070606070220.d762ea3f.mle+ocaml@mega-nerd.com> In-Reply-To: <0A529E70-9CBD-415F-951C-7357A9E90F36@gmail.com> References: <200706051913.13481.jon@ffconsultancy.com> <875c7e070706051213s37c3ff11q81ca267ee0f9a252@mail.gmail.com> <0A529E70-9CBD-415F-951C-7357A9E90F36@gmail.com> Organization: Erik Conspiracy Secret Labs X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.3.1 (GTK+ 2.10.11; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 4665CF5F.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; ocaml:01 jocaml:01 camlp:01 erlang:01 syntax:01 ocaml:01 erlang:01 syntax:01 jocaml:01 camlp:01 wrote:01 typing:01 caml-list:01 concurrency:02 filenames:02 Joel Reymont wrote: > I'm gonna go bonkers soon. Suppose I know and quite like Erlang but > dislike its syntax and performance on non-IO things. I'm also quite > fond of OCaml. I'm very keen on Ocaml and started learning Erlang for the concurrency. However, Erlang's syntax, dynamic typing and "everything runs in the erl shell" thing started to annoy me. So JoCaml is currently looking *really* good. > Should I go with JoCaml? Camlp3l? Why? I think we let Jon Harrop and others (maybe even me) thrash this out on a number of examples and then enjoy the benefits:-). Erik -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Erik de Castro Lopo ----------------------------------------------------------------- "I do have a policy of mandatory evisceration where the crime of whitespace in filenames is perpetrated on my systems. This has inspired a new range of designer colostomy bag covers in corduroy, velvet, and the ever popular denim." -- jdub on the SLUG mailing list