From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from discorde.inria.fr (discorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.38]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id C776BBC0A for ; Wed, 6 Jun 2007 10:18:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from einhorn.in-berlin.de (einhorn.in-berlin.de [192.109.42.8]) by discorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l568IR7H003289 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Wed, 6 Jun 2007 10:18:28 +0200 X-Envelope-From: oliver@first.in-berlin.de X-Envelope-To: Received: from first (dslb-088-073-088-113.pools.arcor-ip.net [88.73.88.113]) (authenticated bits=0) by einhorn.in-berlin.de (8.13.6/8.13.6/Debian-1) with ESMTP id l568IOao013101 for ; Wed, 6 Jun 2007 10:18:27 +0200 Received: by first (Postfix, from userid 501) id 8F2833D3C5D; Wed, 6 Jun 2007 10:18:15 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 10:18:15 +0200 From: Oliver Bandel To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] JoCaml Released. Message-ID: <20070606081814.GC348@first.in-berlin.de> References: <20070604085744.GA4654@yquem.inria.fr> <891bd3390706040513r398a8415r4d790c6040ed200@mail.gmail.com> <1180960734.11351.135.camel@rosella.wigram> <20070604135743.GA340@first.in-berlin.de> <873b17zu1o.fsf@mitre.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <873b17zu1o.fsf@mitre.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang_at_IN-Berlin_e.V. on 192.109.42.8 X-Miltered: at discorde with ID 46666DD4.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; bandel:01 in-berlin:01 jocaml:01 bandel:01 in-berlin:01 wikipedia:01 maila:98 wrote:01 wrote:01 oliver:01 oliver:01 caml-list:01 writes:01 calculus:01 latter:03 On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 10:13:55AM -0400, Joshua D. Guttman wrote: > Oliver Bandel writes: > > > > > > > As far as I know only polycontextural logic can express > > parallel, distributed systems (and selfreference) in a > > complete/total way. So, when join calculus is > > monocontextural (which it is, if it uses the math we all > > have learned) it will be a subsystem of what can be > > expressed with polycontextural logic. > > > > Well, I googled and found the Wikipedia article on Gotthard > Guenther, which talked about trans-Aristotelian logic and > the law of the excluded middle (shades of Korzybski! Were > they connected?). > > But there was no indication what > monocontextural/polycontextural meant, or why only the > latter expresses distribution *completely*. > > Could you give a brief summary, please? [...] I answered to your private maila ddress twice. ...well oooh, I didn't saw you also wrote to this list. I will collect both mails and send it to the list today. Ciao, Oliver