From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93443BC69 for ; Sun, 17 Jun 2007 19:40:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from yquem.inria.fr (yquem.inria.fr [128.93.8.37]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l5HHeXRq017419 for ; Sun, 17 Jun 2007 19:40:33 +0200 Received: by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix, from userid 25991) id 32E92BC69; Sun, 17 Jun 2007 19:40:33 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2007 19:40:33 +0200 From: Daniel de Rauglaudre To: Caml List Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Ledit 3.10 Message-ID: <20070617174033.GA424@yquem.inria.fr> References: <71767b800706170931o2969c8f8g391e8ee3f1104e1b@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <71767b800706170931o2969c8f8g391e8ee3f1104e1b@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 46757211.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; rauglaudre:01 rauglaudre:01 ledit:01 ledit:01 camlp:01 geneweb:01 camlp:01 syntax:01 compilation:01 ocaml:01 geneweb:01 translated:01 ocaml:01 softwares:98 wrote:01 Hi, On Sun, Jun 17, 2007 at 12:31:55PM -0400, Ralph Douglass wrote: > Is there a copy of ledit floating around that compiles under 3.10? The > latest version I found was 1.13, at http://pauillac.inria.fr/~ddr/ledit/. I > may just not know where to look. Ledit compiles perfectly with Camlp4s that you can download on my site. I am sorry, I am not going to port my softwares (GeneWeb, ledit, mlrogue, olibrt) into the new Camlp4, because I don't agree with the fundamental choices of that camlp4 (in particular, changes in the syntax tree, and I disagree the use of some libraries, programs, programming and compilation technics, interfaces, tools, source tree). These choices are too different to be compatible with my point of view. I would like to cooperate with the OCaml team to improve their Camlp4, they are nice people but they are taking to what I call wrong directions. (They know my point of view, I told them.) I need Camlp4 for GeneWeb, but I did not manage to port it to the new Camlp4, and it is the main reason why I resurected the version of Camlp4 I had. These days, I have been preparing a new version with a new pretty printing system used and documentation pages. If it is a question of naming, I can rename my Camlp4 into Camlp5 or whatever, but ledit will not be translated into the Camlp4 distributed with OCaml. -- Daniel de Rauglaudre http://pauillac.inria.fr/~ddr/