From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C0ECBC69 for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2007 17:28:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ptb-relay03.plus.net (ptb-relay03.plus.net [212.159.14.214]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l5PFSBT6029164 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2007 17:28:12 +0200 Received: from [80.229.56.224] (helo=beast.local) by ptb-relay03.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1I2qU6-0003Wd-Sn for caml-list@yquem.inria.fr; Mon, 25 Jun 2007 16:28:11 +0100 From: Jon Harrop Organization: Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd. To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Function inlining and functor Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 16:22:21 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200706251622.21625.jon@ffconsultancy.com> X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 467FDF0B.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; inlining:01 functor:01 ocaml:01 metaocaml:01 ocaml:01 frog:98 wrote:01 caml-list:01 short:01 function:08 generating:08 similar:11 ltd:86 products:86 www:84 On Monday 25 June 2007 15:39:02 Qu=F4c Peyrot wrote: > Am I out of luck to get similar performance than C++? Short of generating OCaml code or using MetaOCaml, yes. =2D-=20 Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd. The OCaml Journal http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/ocaml_journal/?e