From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39A26BC6C for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2007 18:03:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ptb-relay02.plus.net (ptb-relay02.plus.net [212.159.14.213]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l5PG3wu6009548 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2007 18:03:59 +0200 Received: from [80.229.56.224] (helo=beast.local) by ptb-relay02.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1I2r2i-0002Se-Op for caml-list@yquem.inria.fr; Mon, 25 Jun 2007 17:03:57 +0100 From: Jon Harrop Organization: Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd. To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Function inlining and functor Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 16:58:04 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <467FE228.5040907@starynkevitch.net> <09C0AA9F-2021-49B5-89EB-B525A1757446@lrde.epita.fr> In-Reply-To: <09C0AA9F-2021-49B5-89EB-B525A1757446@lrde.epita.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200706251658.04780.jon@ffconsultancy.com> X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 467FE76E.001 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; inlining:01 functor:01 functor:01 compilation:01 ocaml:01 compiler:01 ocaml:01 frog:98 wrote:01 inline:01 caml-list:01 missing:07 missing:07 function:08 function:08 On Monday 25 June 2007 16:50:03 Qu=F4c Peyrot wrote: > But in the functor example, what is missing during the compilation to > be able to inline it? The thing that is missing is the code in the OCaml compiler than inlines th= ese=20 function calls. :-) This was one of the demands on the "what optimizations would we like" list= =20 that was discussed here recently. =2D-=20 Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd. The OCaml Journal http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/ocaml_journal/?e