From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from discorde.inria.fr (discorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.38]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC521BC69 for ; Tue, 26 Jun 2007 05:28:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ptb-relay02.plus.net (ptb-relay02.plus.net [212.159.14.213]) by discorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l5Q3SNND014088 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 26 Jun 2007 05:28:23 +0200 Received: from [80.229.56.224] (helo=beast.local) by ptb-relay02.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1I31j4-000345-P8 for caml-list@yquem.inria.fr; Tue, 26 Jun 2007 04:28:22 +0100 From: Jon Harrop Organization: Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd. To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Function inlining and functor Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 04:22:33 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <200706251707.25356.jon@ffconsultancy.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200706260422.34024.jon@ffconsultancy.com> X-Miltered: at discorde with ID 468087D7.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; inlining:01 functor:01 metaocaml:01 ocaml:01 metaocaml:01 jocaml:01 alain's:01 ocaml:01 2007,:98 chicks:98 frog:98 cvs:01 wrote:01 wrote:01 maintainers:01 On Monday 25 June 2007 21:11:34 Joel Reymont wrote: > On Jun 25, 2007, at 5:07 PM, Jon Harrop wrote: > > MetaOCaml rocks. I do hope it becomes mainstream... :-) > > I wonder what kind of process is used to decide what becomes > mainstream (part of the OCaml distribution?) and what doesn't. I believe standard procedure is to get Xavier drunk before persuading him that chicks dig MetaOCaml maintainers (a testimonial from Walid would help). > I suppose that keeping up CVS tree containing, say, MetaOCaml and > JoCaml would quickly get tedious. I may be mistaken, though. I would certainly appreciate it if someone brought MetaOCaml up to date (3.10) and added Alain's AMD64 support. MetaOCaml seems to have stabilized, so this might not be completely out of the question... -- Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd. The OCaml Journal http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/ocaml_journal/?e