From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id E40D8BC69 for ; Tue, 26 Jun 2007 05:28:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ptb-relay03.plus.net (ptb-relay03.plus.net [212.159.14.214]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l5Q3SW7g027817 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 26 Jun 2007 05:28:32 +0200 Received: from [80.229.56.224] (helo=beast.local) by ptb-relay03.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1I31jE-0001OM-3p for caml-list@yquem.inria.fr; Tue, 26 Jun 2007 04:28:32 +0100 From: Jon Harrop Organization: Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd. To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Function inlining and functor Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 04:22:43 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <200706251658.04780.jon@ffconsultancy.com> <5DCFC41E-33A9-47A4-BFBE-3070297ABDB7@lrde.epita.fr> In-Reply-To: <5DCFC41E-33A9-47A4-BFBE-3070297ABDB7@lrde.epita.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200706260422.43630.jon@ffconsultancy.com> X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 468087E0.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; inlining:01 functor:01 inlining:01 compiler:01 compiler:01 afaik:01 wikis:01 ocaml:01 ocaml:01 frog:98 wrote:01 caml-list:01 i'd:05 somewhere:06 function:08 On Monday 25 June 2007 18:04:46 Qu=F4c Peyrot wrote: > PS: I just tried to read the code for inlining in the compiler, to > have some > idea how complicated it is, but of course, without much exposure I > couldn't make sense of what I was reading. > Is there any "Hacking" doc for the compiler somewhere? Not AFAIK but I'd love one. Any chance we could impose on one of the Wikis= =20 people were discussing here recently? =2D-=20 Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd. The OCaml Journal http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/ocaml_journal/?e