From: Erik de Castro Lopo <mle+ocaml@mega-nerd.com>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Sorted list
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 06:47:47 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070806064747.e208840b.mle+ocaml@mega-nerd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070805132244.GB8212@furbychan.cocan.org>
Richard Jones wrote:
> Again, I'm not suggesting that we fork OCaml.
I am suggesting that it should only be done for experiments of
a large and intrusive nature (ie experiments of a JoCaml size
or larger).
Forking for incremental language improvements would indeed be
silly.
Erik
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Erik de Castro Lopo
-----------------------------------------------------------------
"C++ is like jamming a helicopter inside a Miata and expecting
some sort of improvement." -- Drew Olbrich
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-05 21:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-04 9:35 tmp123
2007-08-04 10:00 ` [Caml-list] " Jon Harrop
2007-08-04 10:29 ` Philippe Wang
2007-08-04 11:22 ` skaller
2007-08-04 12:23 ` Philippe Wang
2007-08-04 13:39 ` skaller
2007-08-04 14:01 ` Philippe Wang
2007-08-04 14:45 ` skaller
2007-08-04 14:27 ` tmp123
2007-08-04 20:33 ` Christophe TROESTLER
2007-08-04 14:37 ` tmp123
2007-08-04 15:09 ` Brian Hurt
2007-08-04 15:42 ` skaller
2007-08-04 16:21 ` Richard Jones
2007-08-04 17:17 ` Brian Hurt
2007-08-04 18:24 ` skaller
2007-08-04 17:54 ` skaller
2007-08-04 19:16 ` Richard Jones
2007-08-05 16:22 ` David Allsopp
2007-08-05 16:41 ` Xavier Leroy
2007-08-05 17:01 ` David Allsopp
2007-08-04 17:35 ` Julien Moutinho
2007-08-04 18:04 ` skaller
2007-08-05 1:47 ` Jon Harrop
2007-08-05 11:44 ` Erik de Castro Lopo
2007-08-05 12:03 ` Jacques GARRIGUE
2007-08-05 12:31 ` Erik de Castro Lopo
2007-08-05 13:22 ` Richard Jones
2007-08-05 20:47 ` Erik de Castro Lopo [this message]
2007-08-05 13:17 ` Richard Jones
2007-08-05 16:26 ` Xavier Leroy
2007-08-05 23:47 ` skaller
2007-08-04 15:36 ` skaller
2007-08-04 15:17 ` tmp123
2007-08-12 12:05 ` Andrej Bauer
2007-08-04 12:15 ` Brian Hurt
2007-08-04 12:36 ` Brian Hurt
2007-08-04 13:49 ` skaller
2007-08-04 12:16 ` Daniel Bünzli
2007-08-04 12:58 ` Oliver Bandel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070806064747.e208840b.mle+ocaml@mega-nerd.com \
--to=mle+ocaml@mega-nerd.com \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).