From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from discorde.inria.fr (discorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.38]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FE38BC69 for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 23:01:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp.syd.people.net.au (smtp.syd.people.net.au [218.214.225.98]) by discorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id l75Klo0a014098 for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 22:47:52 +0200 Received: (qmail 3151 invoked from network); 5 Aug 2007 20:47:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hendrix.mega-nerd.net) (218.214.64.136) by smtp.syd.people.net.au with SMTP; 5 Aug 2007 20:47:47 -0000 Received: from hendrix (hendrix [192.168.200.99]) by hendrix.mega-nerd.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 1EFA9300F0 for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 06:47:47 +1000 (EST) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 06:47:47 +1000 From: Erik de Castro Lopo To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Sorted list Message-Id: <20070806064747.e208840b.mle+ocaml@mega-nerd.com> In-Reply-To: <20070805132244.GB8212@furbychan.cocan.org> References: <20070804173517.GA24131@jiyu.gnu> <200708050247.34512.jon@ffconsultancy.com> <20070805214459.c676d93a.mle+ocaml@mega-nerd.com> <20070805.210349.2004151930.garrigue@math.nagoya-u.ac.jp> <20070805223148.44eef102.mle+ocaml@mega-nerd.com> <20070805132244.GB8212@furbychan.cocan.org> Organization: Erik Conspiracy Secret Labs X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.3.1 (GTK+ 2.10.11; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Miltered: at discorde with ID 46B63776.002 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; ocaml:01 ocaml:01 jocaml:01 incremental:01 wrote:01 caml-list:01 suggesting:02 suggesting:02 experiments:03 experiments:03 erik:04 erik:04 size:95 fork:05 indeed:07 Richard Jones wrote: > Again, I'm not suggesting that we fork OCaml. I am suggesting that it should only be done for experiments of a large and intrusive nature (ie experiments of a JoCaml size or larger). Forking for incremental language improvements would indeed be silly. Erik -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Erik de Castro Lopo ----------------------------------------------------------------- "C++ is like jamming a helicopter inside a Miata and expecting some sort of improvement." -- Drew Olbrich