From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 324C0BC69 for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2007 09:59:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from furbychan.cocan.org (furbychan.cocan.org [80.68.91.176]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l7F7xkDF020753 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2007 09:59:47 +0200 Received: from rich by furbychan.cocan.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1ILDn4-0001Iu-00; Wed, 15 Aug 2007 08:59:42 +0100 Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 08:59:42 +0100 To: Fernando Alegre Cc: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Weak hash table for attaching extra data to an object Message-ID: <20070815075942.GA1455@furbychan.cocan.org> References: <20070814101535.GA14485@furbychan.cocan.org> <20070814162206.GA1651@furbychan.cocan.org> <20070814233513.GA12095@gato.physics.und.nodak.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070814233513.GA12095@gato.physics.und.nodak.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: Richard Jones X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 46C2B272.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; hash:01 0100,:01 wrote:01 wrote:01 caml-list:01 data:02 tue:06 tue:06 long:06 weak:06 table:93 fernando:06 red:92 alegre:08 attaching:09 On Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 06:35:40PM -0500, Fernando Alegre wrote: > On Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 05:22:06PM +0100, Richard Jones wrote: > > > if this is safe or not. > > > > Array.create 0 (Obj.magic ()) > > > > I wonder if this the same as just [||] Yes it is. I was looking so long at the details that I didn't see the obvious answer. Rich. -- Richard Jones Red Hat