From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBA06BC6B for ; Fri, 21 Sep 2007 19:09:43 +0200 (CEST) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgAAAAKY80bR4q9Knmdsb2JhbACOGwIBAQcEBgcIGA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.20,284,1186351200"; d="scan'208";a="1547882" Received: from tomts20-srv.bellnexxia.net ([209.226.175.74]) by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 21 Sep 2007 19:11:16 +0200 Received: from iron.mattcox.ca ([65.93.134.127]) by tomts20-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.13 201-253-122-130-113-20050324) with ESMTP id <20070921171114.TBPG8273.tomts20-srv.bellnexxia.net@iron.mattcox.ca> for ; Fri, 21 Sep 2007 13:11:14 -0400 Received: by iron.mattcox.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A39925D8DD4; Fri, 21 Sep 2007 13:11:01 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 13:11:01 -0400 From: Matthew William Cox To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: readline license (was: [ANN] coThreads 0.10) Message-ID: <20070921171101.GA7150@iron.mattcox.ca> References: <877imm2z7h.fsf@pps.jussieu.fr> <1190249430.6642.1.camel@rosella.wigram> <20070920142938.d48552f2.mle+ocaml@mega-nerd.com> <1190272316.23116.34.camel@rosella.wigram> <20070920175233.a510630b.mle+ocaml@mega-nerd.com> <87abrhka16.fsf@pps.jussieu.fr> <1190284989.6770.28.camel@rosella.wigram> <20070920104420.GB25394@localhost.localdomain> <1190300562.6036.0.camel@rosella.wigram> <46F3F25E.8020202@inria.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="yrj/dFKFPuw6o+aM" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <46F3F25E.8020202@inria.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) X-Spam: no; 0.00; readline:01 0200,:01 readline:01 ocaml's:01 toplevel:01 cheers:01 0.10:98 wrote:01 caml-list:01 linking:02 identifiers:04 fri:05 xavier:06 sep:06 linked:07 X-Attachments: type="application/pgp-signature" --yrj/dFKFPuw6o+aM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 06:33:34PM +0200, Xavier Leroy wrote: > This said, rlwrap works pretty well and I don't see many advantages to > linking directly with readline. First off, agree with you that rlwrap works well. That being said, having an rl-alike linked with Ocaml's toplevel would add some capabilities: * tab completion of identifiers currently in the environment * ability to reject malformed/non-parsing lines from the history They're not killer features by any stretch, but they are a nice touch. Cheers, Matthew Cox --yrj/dFKFPuw6o+aM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUBRvP7JIpoKfW5AubsAQIb2w//WVwF1d8lfwIFEGMup+oJAYrtm7270/8d cUQS9bqpVUGgb//S3/g2qbjTOXcmZEzHI0qkRXDrkAUazBx+oZLhVGv+ID65KW5m 4ffQfwA0b2VM3de5jwG/eiJmHgNeDLWzo/a618S1AK3KDLdggAyRY+8UD796sEtu Z1GcV6NIY0/aO+mAX4LeK1frUqXThxSpb15k0+RQPgLd9nxnWgfKdcwOUyph3ySd oeFG4lxVuxSH0WeVBkkL6CRWVeIzwrFaaanJoD1oPQuzSJHqW0zURBy/5h7MLdkb MwuQZP6aoMEvasHjVwdWQgf6un4wL12jHCC/JBLAb3B8MuoGnghmXTiHrhYL00ov BFw9zmZGKhN4nQPjPKScN2mCNG/R8HX/ub+Y+PkBVynDLDr6BhqbvyF4q44Qy7Jo RZvrDlRRuC+iqIW7t8ICCRi2rBymVAC60+809EQiXBpKOFzIMmmNBXWCrlr2uJ5Q kjl2aJcqjZ0Z3YZP8CUcjmIl4ZXnH6HcNjuh1qZ8/31vuuZzobU5ktEfOLh0TszG QNcbksQDWPC2/QPSELjAwmP6aXdCmKhC9Zv4PvsKeDa0tJKJw1RoYVYnA2zxv/t0 9CK3613902PxUXHNlqlUmmQKJSjfo6YxnAHqZ/akzdx2nSIAydLKITFe4ALOP9vb PYOydI5EHdM= =FuhR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --yrj/dFKFPuw6o+aM--