From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id B62C8BC6B for ; Tue, 9 Oct 2007 17:57:06 +0200 (CEST) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ao8CADJBC0fUVZgL/2dsb2JhbAA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.21,249,1188770400"; d="scan'208";a="4271390" Received: from hades.snarc.org ([212.85.152.11]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 09 Oct 2007 17:57:06 +0200 Received: by hades.snarc.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E04B11B482; Tue, 9 Oct 2007 17:57:02 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 17:57:02 +0200 To: Jon Harrop Cc: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: Rope is the new string Message-ID: <20071009155702.GB26282@snarc.org> References: <1191879429.28011.27.camel@rosella.wigram> <1191886669.26491.29.camel@rosella.wigram> <20071009.122004.251675959.Christophe.Troestler+ocaml@umh.ac.be> <200710091440.48381.jon@ffconsultancy.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200710091440.48381.jon@ffconsultancy.com> X-Warning: Email may contain unsmilyfied humor and/or satire. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-11) From: tab@snarc.org (Vincent Hanquez) X-Spam: no; 0.00; 0100,:01 wrote:01 caml-list:01 string:02 string:02 tue:06 vincent:07 vincent:07 ropes:13 oct:14 would:18 2007:81 chars:20 together:23 why:24 On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 02:40:48PM +0100, Jon Harrop wrote: > Out of curiosity, do your ropes handle UTF-8 and UTF-16? Out of curiosity, why would a string implementation (has a handle of chars bundle together) has to handle UTF-X ? -- Vincent Hanquez