From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 473FDBC6B for ; Thu, 11 Oct 2007 16:21:44 +0200 (CEST) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ao8CALLNDUfUVZgL/2dsb2JhbAA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.21,260,1188770400"; d="scan'208";a="2775197" Received: from hades.snarc.org ([212.85.152.11]) by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 11 Oct 2007 16:21:44 +0200 Received: by hades.snarc.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 79FA91B482; Thu, 11 Oct 2007 16:21:41 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 16:21:41 +0200 To: skaller Cc: Chris King , caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: Rope is the new string Message-ID: <20071011142141.GA8001@snarc.org> References: <20071009.122004.251675959.Christophe.Troestler+ocaml@umh.ac.be> <200710091440.48381.jon@ffconsultancy.com> <20071009155702.GB26282@snarc.org> <6f9f8f4a0710090942u2afe6c5erc2d5b11ecfff2253@mail.gmail.com> <20071009165520.GA27507@snarc.org> <6f9f8f4a0710091032r3dace80bi4f9b584ae5056675@mail.gmail.com> <20071009195119.GA29263@snarc.org> <875c7e070710091504j203ff78y8703fc5c22086671@mail.gmail.com> <20071011130354.GA7016@snarc.org> <1192110864.6045.12.camel@rosella.wigram> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1192110864.6045.12.camel@rosella.wigram> X-Warning: Email may contain unsmilyfied humor and/or satire. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-11) From: tab@snarc.org (Vincent Hanquez) X-Spam: no; 0.00; camomile:01 camomile:01 wrote:01 caml-list:01 functions:01 string:02 string:02 library:03 library:03 complex:05 complex:05 thu:05 problem:05 vincent:07 vincent:07 On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 11:54:24PM +1000, skaller wrote: > You can't: Camomile is massive for a reason.. the problem it > aims to solve is complex and hard to do efficiently without > a large set of specialised functions. You are assuming that i want efficiency where i want to print few unicode string in an ui here and there. I *DON'T* want to be exposed to full unicode, i need something like 1/100 of camomile library. If i need to do something complex with unicode or control everything the library is doing, i'ld use camomile. -- Vincent Hanquez