From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E090BC6B for ; Fri, 12 Oct 2007 20:47:31 +0200 (CEST) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Aq4HAHpeD0eAArkpbGdsb2JhbACBWoxzCwQGEBk X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.21,267,1188770400"; d="scan'208";a="2945226" Received: from chokecherry.srv.cs.cmu.edu ([128.2.185.41]) by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 12 Oct 2007 20:47:30 +0200 Received: from stratocaster.home (c-71-206-252-35.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [71.206.252.35]) (authenticated bits=0) by chokecherry.srv.cs.cmu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l9CIlQs5003882 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 12 Oct 2007 14:47:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ecc by stratocaster.home with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1IgPXi-0002Wq-Qv for caml-list@yquem.inria.fr; Fri, 12 Oct 2007 14:47:26 -0400 Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 14:47:26 -0400 From: Eric Cooper To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] A labltk book? Message-ID: <20071012184726.GC2970@stratocaster.home> Mail-Followup-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr References: <470EFD32.4060904@msu.edu> <200710120743.33099.jon@ffconsultancy.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200710120743.33099.jon@ffconsultancy.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-11) X-Spam: no; 0.00; labltk:01 0100,:01 labltk:01 ocaml:01 wrote:01 wrote:01 caml-list:01 programming:03 gui:03 apps:04 apps:04 imo:04 fri:05 widgets:05 i'd:06 On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 07:43:32AM +0100, Jon Harrop wrote: > On Friday 12 October 2007 05:50:58 Jeff Shaw wrote: > > I'm wondering if there's much of a market for a proper Labltk book? > I'd love a book on GUI programming with OCaml! Is LabkGTK2 more > popular than LablTK? Probably. Its widgets are also much nicer looking, and apps written with it don't look jarringly out of place on a modern desktop the way Tk apps do. (All IMO, of course.) -- Eric Cooper e c c @ c m u . e d u