From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <micha-1@fantasymail.de>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,SPF_FAIL 
	autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3
X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82])
	by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AD2EBC6B
	for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Fri, 12 Oct 2007 22:13:56 +0200 (CEST)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgAAAHxxD0fVpUAUnmdsb2JhbACOTQEBAQEHBAYRGA
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.21,268,1188770400"; 
   d="scan'208";a="2862769"
Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20])
  by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with SMTP; 12 Oct 2007 22:13:56 +0200
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 12 Oct 2007 20:13:55 -0000
Received: from X8aaf.x.pppool.de (EHLO noname) [89.59.138.175]
  by mail.gmx.net (mp048) with SMTP; 12 Oct 2007 22:13:55 +0200
X-Authenticated: #20477425
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/5xuoxflH5RnpgQyFJ2tTxNp82YvXcG/CYjPpc6p
	A2b185sRDgGpew
From: Michael Wohlwend <micha-1@fantasymail.de>
To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] A labltk book?
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 22:13:52 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7
References: <456409.56385.qm@web54603.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <456409.56385.qm@web54603.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
X-Face: S)[vu%Bha1d&ej9GfwAq~7C}A,y[B.uS}+D6'hb~xPwsxymw$fnCOaMe<=?utf-8?q?*bnUajSBR=5Fm=3FR=0A=09?=@V3;iX8[A}z`.%pEQ1r7iZhN8#ktTCBQ}&mkx>=RH&l|l6\]NZI@
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200710122213.53007.micha-1@fantasymail.de>
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
X-Spam: no; 0.00; labltk:01 gtk:01 gtk:01 ocaml:01 swig:01 lib:01 smoke:98 smoke:98 typing:01 caml-list:01 match:02 binding:02 binding:02 python:03 generated:05 

Am Freitag 12 Oktober 2007 22:03:17 schrieb Dario Teixeira:
> I have used both Qt and Gtk before, and in my opinion, not only does
> Qt's elegance give it an edge over Gtk, it also feels like it would be
> a better match to OCaml.

you have to go via C so it's much work and the available tools to do the 
automagically aren't good enaugh to do it  (ok, there is swig, but I don't 
like  the way the binding is generated).
There exists the smoke project, it a lib to interface qt and python or ruby 
use it to bind to qt (and the next perl qt will also you smoke). Maybe that'a 
an easier way to do it (but it's c++ again)...

I have done a binding (most of it) to fltk2 by hand and even if fltk2 is small 
it's much typing.... :-)

Michael