From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <rich@annexia.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=disabled 
	version=3.1.3
X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82])
	by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11DD8BC6B
	for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Sun, 28 Oct 2007 22:48:50 +0100 (CET)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ao8CAKqgJEdQRFuw/2dsb2JhbAA
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.21,339,1188770400"; 
   d="scan'208";a="3760218"
Received: from furbychan.cocan.org ([80.68.91.176])
  by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 28 Oct 2007 22:48:49 +0100
Received: from rich by furbychan.cocan.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1ImFzq-0005rW-00; Sun, 28 Oct 2007 21:48:38 +0000
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 21:48:38 +0000
To: Chris Conway <cconway@courant.nyu.edu>
Cc: Daniel =?iso-8859-1?Q?B=FCnzli?= <daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch>,
	caml-list <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Camlidl questions
Message-ID: <20071028214836.GA16097@furbychan.cocan.org>
References: <4a051d930710261336r33a4d3aycda32880c1663953@mail.gmail.com> <3596AC1F-C054-44AC-96E6-2C95E1072F23@erratique.ch> <20071027164553.GA26579@furbychan.cocan.org> <Pine.GSO.4.63.0710271920270.7109@access2.cims.nyu.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.63.0710271920270.7109@access2.cims.nyu.edu>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
From: Richard Jones <rich@annexia.org>
X-Spam: no; 0.00; camlidl:01 annotations:01 low-level:01 camlidl:01 swig:01 wrote:01 caml-list:01 confusing:02 bugs:03 chris:06 red:92 99%:90 i'm:09 generating:09 obvious:10 

On Sat, Oct 27, 2007 at 07:27:15PM -0400, Chris Conway wrote:
> I'm afraid I don't understand this position at all. With a few dozen, 
> mostly obvious, annotations to the header files, I have covered 99% of the 
> library's functionality, automatically generating several thousand lines 
> of low-level boilerplate code. Leaving aside the possibility of known bugs 
> in Camlidl that might never get fixed... why would I want to code this all 
> by hand?

Sorry, I was somehow confusing camlidl & SWIG.

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones
Red Hat