From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2D12BC6C for ; Fri, 1 Feb 2008 16:59:50 +0100 (CET) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ao8CAM7QokfUVZgL/2dsb2JhbACuXQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,290,1199660400"; d="scan'208";a="8616548" Received: from concorde.inria.fr ([192.93.2.39]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 01 Feb 2008 16:59:50 +0100 Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m11Fxlc4008161 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=OK) for ; Fri, 1 Feb 2008 16:59:50 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ao8CAM7QokfUVZgL/2dsb2JhbACuXQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,290,1199660400"; d="scan'208";a="8616546" Received: from hades.snarc.org ([212.85.152.11]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 01 Feb 2008 16:59:47 +0100 Received: by hades.snarc.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6EF9A1B482; Fri, 1 Feb 2008 16:59:44 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 16:59:44 +0100 To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?B=FCnzli?= Daniel Cc: caml-list List Subject: Re: [Caml-list] [OSR] Exceptionless error management Message-ID: <20080201155944.GA6369@snarc.org> References: <9d3ec8300801310157r77b86fc0k80f40b1df36091c2@mail.gmail.com> <0640C30E-07B5-4885-AC38-671755BB79AA@erratique.ch> <47A1D68B.70700@fmf.uni-lj.si> <861w7xb0gi.fsf@Llea.celt.neu> <89B95036-D3D1-41FD-B99A-ED46D54BF89E@erratique.ch> <9d3ec8300802010250n5921415r36eb7f9773ef3681@mail.gmail.com> <2F3349DE-E200-4147-A5ED-78366A636D9E@erratique.ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <2F3349DE-E200-4147-A5ED-78366A636D9E@erratique.ch> X-Warning: Email may contain unsmilyfied humor and/or satire. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-11) From: tab@snarc.org (Vincent Hanquez) X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 47A341F3.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; 0100,:01 bunzli:01 variants:01 polymorphic:01 wrote:01 clearer:01 caml-list:01 variant:02 variant:02 tend:03 daniel:04 fri:05 vincent:07 vincent:07 cases:08 On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 12:31:52PM +0100, Bünzli Daniel wrote: > On the safety bit I think this is less true if you actually take care to > close your variants. However I tend to agree on the clearer separation of > cases. I added a request for comments on this at the end of the OSR page to > standardize on [ `Value of ... | `Error of ... ] instead of [ `Value of ... > | .... ]. but what's wrong with the plain [ Value of ... | Error of ... ] variant instead of polymorphic variant ? -- Vincent Hanquez