caml-list - the Caml user's mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mathijs Romans <mathijs@romansland.nl>
To: Damien Doligez <damien.doligez@inria.fr>
Cc: caml-list <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] What does "pc" mean in ocamldebug
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 12:39:35 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200802071239.35606.mathijs@romansland.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <08F4E8BB-F4BE-41E6-B437-437E6597435F@inria.fr>

On Thursday 07 February 2008 11:46:47 Damien Doligez wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 2008-01-31, at 00:45, Mathijs Romans wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > I am trying to make a Caml-application run that I have not written
> > myself. I
> > know very little about the language itself. Sadly, I get this error:
> >
> > Fatal error: exception Out_of_memory
> >
> > Using ocamldebugger I am trying to figure out what happened. The
> > last line
> > before failure is:
> > Time : 36381 - pc : 65532 - module Parser
> > 157     <|b|>if !current.son = !current then
> >
> > What caught my attention is that the number after "pc" is almost
> > 2^16, which
> > is probably the cause of my problem. I cannot find anywhere in the
> > documentation what "pc" means, nor how I can increase its maximum
> > value. Can
> > somebody help me?
>
> pc is the value of the program counter, i.e. the index of the current
> byte-code instruction.  It is absolutely not limited to 2^16, and
> I am quite sure its value has nothing to do with the bug you are
> looking for.
>
> Apparently, you're getting an Out_of_memory exception in the execution
> of
> the equality test.  Since equality is recursive, it has to go through
> both data structures and if they are cyclic it may not terminate.
> If they are cyclic and have enough complexity, it will recursively
> call itself until its stack overflows, which is reported as an
> Out_of_memory exception.
>
> The workaround is to avoid comparing cyclic data structures.
>
> -- Damien

Thanks for the information. You're right, the program counter has nothing to 
do with the issue. I learned that between versions 3.06 and 3.08 the rules 
for a recursive equality test have changed, and I now need to update my 
program.

Mathijs


      reply	other threads:[~2008-02-07 11:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-01-30 23:45 Mathijs Romans
2008-01-31  9:39 ` [Caml-list] " Pietro Abate
2008-02-07 10:46 ` Damien Doligez
2008-02-07 11:39   ` Mathijs Romans [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200802071239.35606.mathijs@romansland.nl \
    --to=mathijs@romansland.nl \
    --cc=caml-list@yquem.inria.fr \
    --cc=damien.doligez@inria.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).