From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <cobbe@ccs.neu.edu>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled 
	version=3.1.3
X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105])
	by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id A919DBBC1
	for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Wed, 26 Mar 2008 02:37:59 +0100 (CET)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvYCABJG6UeBCnQzbmdsb2JhbACRH5lL
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,555,1199660400"; 
   d="scan'208";a="24187892"
Received: from amber.ccs.neu.edu ([129.10.116.51])
  by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 26 Mar 2008 02:37:59 +0100
Received: from c-24-60-10-50.hsd1.ma.comcast.net ([24.60.10.50] helo=localhost)
	by amber.ccs.neu.edu with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256)
	(Exim 4.50)
	id 1JeKaF-0005ll-Jv; Tue, 25 Mar 2008 21:37:43 -0400
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 21:37:43 -0400
From: Richard Cobbe <cobbe@ccs.neu.edu>
To: caml-list caml-list <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Trouble with "ocamlbuild main.native"
Message-ID: <20080326013743.GA86873@perdita.local>
References: <20080325231712.GB86489@perdita.local> <1206492283-sup-1017@ausone.local>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1206492283-sup-1017@ausone.local>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
X-Spam: no; 0.00; 0100,:01 -for-pack:01 cmx:01 cmx:01 26,:98 wrote:01 binaries:01 ccs:01 compiles:01 caml-list:01 neu:02 native:03 native:03 wed:06 wed:06 

On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 01:46:35AM +0100, Nicolas Pouillard wrote:
> Excerpts from Richard Cobbe's message of Wed Mar 26 00:17:12 +0100 2008:
> > I'm having some difficulty getting ocamlbuild to produce native binaries
> > for a project that's spread over multiple directories.  I'm hoping someone
> > can explain what I'm doing wrong here.
>
> You've hitted the -for-pack oddify :)
>
> [...]
>
> >     <frontEnd/**/*.ml>: for-pack(frontEnd)
> >     <backEnd/**/*.ml>: for-pack(backEnd)
> >     <dataRep/**/*.ml>: for-pack(dataRep)
>
> Almost there... that's .cmx instead of .ml
>
>      <frontEnd/**/*.cmx>: for-pack(frontEnd)
>      <backEnd/**/*.cmx>: for-pack(backEnd)
>      <dataRep/**/*.cmx>: for-pack(dataRep)

Ah!  That was it!

Compiles perfectly now.  Thanks so much!

Richard