From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <peng.zang@gmail.com>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled 
	version=3.1.3
X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105])
	by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F97EBBC1
	for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Fri, 25 Apr 2008 18:12:30 +0200 (CEST)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AoUDAK+fEUhA6bL4c2dsb2JhbACRWAEMAwQECQ8FlR+FFA
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,708,1199660400"; 
   d="scan'208";a="25498507"
Received: from hs-out-0708.google.com ([64.233.178.248])
  by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 25 Apr 2008 18:12:29 +0200
Received: by hs-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id m63so2984795hsc.11
        for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Fri, 25 Apr 2008 09:12:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id;
        bh=FeCcuBv/aod8GOCKDL702sglWAMNJ4JmZI7D/nx2De0=;
        b=RSdkANj1NIHNVZSXnXUOckeoXYOI2fttdJv1nbirz9+BSl+xA37QTHKrxImTDQeF7diqxa1r50Xq87gYNcmRzdDNA/CLrIiK47LrnQAYZpsGj8IiOkeXb4C/qLFGRkZIDv7WHz1Q5/JwrpC8K5qFrq904Ik0t03WqqZ7iQkzDlE=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id;
        b=GhHkphGeVlezMZIbCF6qsk1Qimdtv4HgMdEKnFL30GC5DyMr1/7lve45bswiN8QH6znDycn3UFmp/qQnpv88gFvcV8WT+wP1nf98FyxZpoXrti8njjyWCkchRUal9BJ8mLmYsJm1y2Oc9zYVqxhOtkKgzkljrzixemTmi6aYo5A=
Received: by 10.90.88.17 with SMTP id l17mr5901022agb.8.1209139948692;
        Fri, 25 Apr 2008 09:12:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lawn-143-215-204-204.lawn.gatech.edu ( [143.215.204.204])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q26sm3222472ele.0.2008.04.25.09.12.07
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Fri, 25 Apr 2008 09:12:19 -0700 (PDT)
From: Peng Zang <peng.zang@gmail.com>
Reply-To: peng.zang@gmail.com
To: David Teller <David.Teller@univ-orleans.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] [OSR] Standard syntax extensions ?
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 12:11:50 -0400
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7
Cc: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
References: <713538.14736.qm@web54607.mail.re2.yahoo.com> <200804250958.01989.peng.zang@gmail.com> <1209135875.6192.11.camel@Blefuscu>
In-Reply-To: <1209135875.6192.11.camel@Blefuscu>
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200804251211.53225.peng.zang@gmail.com>
X-Spam: no; 0.00; syntax:01 hash:01 plug-ins:01 cheers:01 hash:01 findlib:01 camlp:01 syntax:01 peng:98 peng:98 customized:98 wrote:01 wrote:01 naming:01 caml-list:01 

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Ahh, sounds good.  Thanks,

Peng

On Friday 25 April 2008 11:04:35 am David Teller wrote:
> The current plans are to have two sets of extensions inside Batteries
> Included:
> * a few will be opened by default
> * some others will just be part of the distribution, with instructions
> in a common format, regarding how to activate & use them
>
> In either case, we will probably have a slightly customized ocamlbuild
> which doesn't need special plug-ins for these extensions (that's part of
> Edgar's side of the work).
>
> Cheers,
>  David
>
> On Fri, 2008-04-25 at 09:57 -0400, Peng Zang wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On Thursday 24 April 2008 01:05:44 pm Dario Teixeira wrote:
> > > Remember the recent thread about ocamlbuild+findlib+camlp4 and the OSR
> > > about standardising naming conventions for syntax extensions [1]. 
> > > Using a special ocamlbuild plugin [2], the barrier to using syntax
> > > extensions is so low that you can almost consider them as standard
> > > language features.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFIEgLJfIRcEFL/JewRAjfWAKDQ9n50OG86N0qtebNzkpDeGWxBwgCePXKs
Q6pxZYriFE2xlATVe1FTShw=
=bufD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----