From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id E73F8BBCA for ; Sat, 10 May 2008 00:08:33 +0200 (CEST) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApoEAFpoJEjUVZsV/2dsb2JhbACrVQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.27,462,1204498800"; d="scan'208";a="12433141" Received: from cerberus.snarc.org ([212.85.155.21]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 10 May 2008 00:08:33 +0200 Received: by cerberus.snarc.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CF0AA129DD; Fri, 9 May 2008 23:01:57 +0100 (BST) Date: Fri, 9 May 2008 23:01:57 +0100 From: Vincent Hanquez To: Jon Harrop Cc: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: Why OCaml **cks Message-ID: <20080509220157.GA16974@snarc.org> References: <200805090139.54870.jon@ffconsultancy.com> <20080509094516.GA12893@snarc.org> <200805091123.51264.jon@ffconsultancy.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200805091123.51264.jon@ffconsultancy.com> X-Warning: Email may contain unsmilyfied humor and/or satire. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) X-Spam: no; 0.00; ocaml:01 0100,:01 ocaml:01 stderr:01 toplevel:01 cave:98 wrote:01 stack:01 exception:01 caml-list:01 output:02 threaded:03 compiled:04 fri:05 long:06 On Fri, May 09, 2008 at 11:23:50AM +0100, Jon Harrop wrote: > That's just crazy talk. Nobody can afford to ignore the multicore era that we > have been in for some time now. I can find lots of interesting use of all my cores without having all my programs be _automaticly_ multi threaded. > > exception traces are *not* available in long running program (daemon). > > Because you compiled it wrongly or because you lost the output? i see you have no idea what a daemon is, and how ocaml can print its stack trace only on stderr when reaching toplevel (i.e. quitting). (on a non-modified version of ocaml) > > have you been hiding in a cave lately? > > With yo mamma. this actually sum up your posts and the idea contains in them pretty well. > You aren't customer facing are you? funny enough that you say that. we both know, which one of us is actually producing some ocaml software that is really selling. -- Vincent