caml-list - the Caml user's mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jon Harrop <jon@ffconsultancy.com>
To: peng.zang@gmail.com, caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] thousands of CPU cores
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 15:00:02 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200807101500.03079.jon@ffconsultancy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200807100944.29221.peng.zang@gmail.com>

On Thursday 10 July 2008 14:44:25 Peng Zang wrote:
> On Thursday 10 July 2008 01:57:44 am J C wrote:
> > I know that Caml team wanted to see if many-core shared-memory systems
> > were going to stick around before bothering with Caml development that
> > takes advantage of them.
> >
> > Well, it looks like they are here to stay, after all:
> >
> > http://news.cnet.com/8301-13924_3-9981760-64.html
>
> This article doesn't say anything about whether the many-core system will
> be shared-memory.  Remember, a shared memory architecture has to deal with
> cache and memory coherence.  The prevailing view is that the overhead for
> such an approach does not scale.  For massively parallel computation we
> must turn to message passing or barrier/sync paradigms.
>
> I am doubtful that a thousand core machine will be shared-memory based.

Today's biggest shared-memory supercomputers already have thousands of cores.

> Also, this is a CNET article.. not exactly known for being in depth or well
> researched and this article is no exception.  It is an article based
> entirely on a few speculative comments of some Intel guys.  I wouldn't take
> it too seriously.
>
> Personally, I can see why the Caml development team opted not to put effort
> into dealing with shared-memory systems.

The OCaml development team put huge effort into their concurrent run-time.

> It is a stop-gap solution... 

That is not true. Many-core machines will always be decomposed into 
shared-memory clusters of as many cores as possible because shared memory 
parallelism will always be orders of magnitude more efficient than 
distributed parallelism.

OCaml is already ~8x slower than F# on today's eight core desktops. If OCaml's 
shortcomings are not remedied then it will become exponentially slower than 
parallelized languages like F# over the next few years until we reach the 
limit of shared memory parallelism in ~10 years time.

Consequently, the parallel GC scheduled for this summer will be the single 
most important development in OCaml world ever.

-- 
Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd.
http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/?e


  reply	other threads:[~2008-07-10 14:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 73+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-07-10  5:57 J C
2008-07-10  6:15 ` [Caml-list] " Erik de Castro Lopo
2008-07-10 12:47   ` Oliver Bandel
2008-07-10 13:48     ` Hezekiah M. Carty
2008-07-10 11:35 ` Jon Harrop
2008-07-14 11:32   ` J C
2008-07-14 12:08     ` Jon Harrop
2008-07-14 17:04       ` Mike Lin
2008-07-14 17:28         ` Jon Harrop
2008-07-14 17:16       ` Richard Jones
2008-07-10 13:21 ` Jon Harrop
2008-07-10 13:44 ` Peng Zang
2008-07-10 14:00   ` Jon Harrop [this message]
2008-07-10 22:25     ` Richard Jones
2008-07-10 23:04       ` Jon Harrop
2008-07-10 23:41         ` Oliver Bandel
2008-07-11  0:17           ` Oliver Bandel
2008-07-11  9:30             ` Richard Jones
2008-09-21 19:05               ` Michaël Grünewald
2008-09-21 21:41                 ` Jon Harrop
2008-09-22  7:51                   ` Alan Schmitt
2008-09-22 19:03                     ` Jon Harrop
2008-09-22 19:49                       ` David Teller
2008-09-23  6:42                       ` kirillkh
2008-09-24 13:30                       ` [Caml-list] Link tracking Chris Clearwater
2008-09-24 15:43                         ` Jon Harrop
2008-07-11 14:53     ` [Caml-list] thousands of CPU cores Peng Zang
2008-07-15 14:39     ` Kuba Ober
2008-07-19 12:41       ` Oliver Bandel
2008-07-10 19:15 ` Gerd Stolpmann
2008-07-10 20:07   ` Sylvain Le Gall
2008-07-10 20:24     ` [Caml-list] " Gerd Stolpmann
2008-07-10 21:02       ` Sylvain Le Gall
2008-07-10 21:19         ` [Caml-list] " Gerd Stolpmann
2008-07-10 21:35           ` Jon Harrop
2008-07-10 22:39             ` Gerd Stolpmann
2008-07-15 15:57           ` Kuba Ober
2008-07-15 18:03             ` Gerd Stolpmann
2008-07-15 19:23               ` Adrien
2008-07-15 19:45                 ` Adrien
2008-07-16  8:59               ` Michaël Grünewald
2008-07-16 16:43                 ` Gerd Stolpmann
2008-07-16 11:46               ` Richard Jones
2008-07-16 18:35                 ` Erik de Castro Lopo
2008-07-17 12:48               ` Kuba Ober
2008-07-15 15:21       ` Kuba Ober
2008-07-10 20:48     ` Basile STARYNKEVITCH
2008-07-10 21:12       ` Jon Harrop
2008-07-10 23:33   ` [Caml-list] " Oliver Bandel
2008-07-10 23:43     ` Oliver Bandel
2008-07-11  6:26     ` Sylvain Le Gall
2008-07-11  8:50       ` [Caml-list] " Jon Harrop
2008-07-11  9:29         ` Sylvain Le Gall
2008-07-15 16:01           ` [Caml-list] " Kuba Ober
2008-07-13  3:17         ` Code Mobility [was Re: thousands of CPU cores] Robert Fischer
2008-07-11  3:01   ` [Caml-list] thousands of CPU cores Brian Hurt
2008-07-11 13:01     ` Gerd Stolpmann
2008-07-11 13:43       ` Jon Harrop
2008-07-11 14:03         ` Basile STARYNKEVITCH
2008-07-11 15:08           ` Jon Harrop
2008-07-11 17:28           ` Jon Harrop
2008-07-11 17:54         ` Richard Jones
2008-07-11 18:30           ` Raoul Duke
2008-07-12 17:35       ` Brian Hurt
2008-07-11 15:01     ` Peng Zang
2008-07-12  0:23       ` Oliver Bandel
2008-07-12 22:54         ` J C
2008-07-19 12:06           ` Oliver Bandel
2008-07-11 14:06 ` Xavier Leroy
2008-07-11 15:20   ` Oliver Bandel
2008-07-11 15:23   ` Bill
2008-07-11 18:14   ` Mattias Engdegård
2008-07-12 23:05   ` J C

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200807101500.03079.jon@ffconsultancy.com \
    --to=jon@ffconsultancy.com \
    --cc=caml-list@yquem.inria.fr \
    --cc=peng.zang@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).