caml-list - the Caml user's mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peng Zang <peng.zang@gmail.com>
To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Cc: "Jon Harrop" <jon@ffconsultancy.com>,
	"Raj Bandyopadhyay" <rajb@rice.edu>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] equality operators in OCaml
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 21:40:36 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200807242140.40245.peng.zang@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <732669E74A7B4E49A8F225F86C335C5E@frodo>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On Thursday 24 July 2008 06:32:36 pm Jon Harrop wrote:
> From: "Raj Bandyopadhyay" <rajb@rice.edu>
>
> > Hi OCaml folk
> >
> > I apologize if I've been asking too many questions on this list recently,
> > but I'm working on a heavy OCaml application and need help sometimes.
> >
> > I am having a disagreement with a colleague about how the equality
> > operators in OCaml work and am trying to resolve it conclusively.
> >
> > 1) I understand that the '==' operator is basically a pointer comparison
> > i.e. a==b true  iff a and b are the same entity. Is this true?
>
> There are some complications here. Firstly, NaN has multiple
> representations that may or may not be physically equal but is always
> structurally unequal to itself.


Yeah, that always seemed broken to me.  If two things are physically equal 
(they occupy the same memory space) it doesn't make sense for them to be 
structurally unequal (contain different content).  Personally, one of the 
first things I did is redefined (=) to fix this.

Peng
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFIiS8YfIRcEFL/JewRAnXqAKCAhHWGTHe6z58jRplmMmnNFgljUACfUhaJ
SQSWrxxpPpHqiJcFBcNlVsM=
=af4P
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


  reply	other threads:[~2008-07-25  1:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-07-24 19:27 Raj Bandyopadhyay
2008-07-24 22:15 ` [Caml-list] " Vincent Hanquez
2008-07-24 22:32 ` Jon Harrop
2008-07-25  1:40   ` Peng Zang [this message]
2008-07-25 10:34     ` Christophe TROESTLER
2008-07-25 12:04       ` Peng Zang
2008-07-25 20:14     ` Matthew William Cox
2008-07-25 22:27       ` Peng Zang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200807242140.40245.peng.zang@gmail.com \
    --to=peng.zang@gmail.com \
    --cc=caml-list@yquem.inria.fr \
    --cc=jon@ffconsultancy.com \
    --cc=rajb@rice.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).