From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED037BBAF for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2008 14:03:26 +0200 (CEST) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApsEAA+9wEjBMjI+/2dsb2JhbACBZbUqgWU X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.32,320,1217800800"; d="scan'208";a="16868742" Received: from haydn2002.u-bourgogne.fr ([193.50.50.62]) by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 05 Sep 2008 14:03:26 +0200 Received: from alcazar.inria.fr (guesdon@topo2.u-bourgogne.fr [193.50.49.147]) by haydn2002.u-bourgogne.fr (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m85C3Phu008030; Fri, 5 Sep 2008 14:03:25 +0200 Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2008 14:03:25 +0200 From: Maxence Guesdon To: David Teller Cc: Caml Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Two questions on OCamlDoc Message-ID: <20080905140325.41812dad@alcazar.inria.fr> In-Reply-To: <1220610303.8100.16.camel@Blefuscu> References: <1220356028.6406.33.camel@Blefuscu> <1220610303.8100.16.camel@Blefuscu> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.5.0 (GTK+ 2.12.11; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Miltered: at haydn02.u-bourgogne.fr with ID 48C1200D.001 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.63 on 193.50.50.62 X-Spam: no; 0.00; maxence:01 guesdon:01 maxence:01 guesdon:01 ocamldoc:01 univ-orleans:01 mli:01 wrote:01 caml-list:01 module:03 module:03 repository:03 fri:05 sep:06 underlying:06 On Fri, 05 Sep 2008 12:25:03 +0200 David Teller wrote: > Okay, I've found the solution to most of my problems, thanks to Maxence. > The code will be committed soon to the Batteries repository if anyone is > interested. > > I have one more question, though: assuming that I have a reference to a > [t_module] for a module with both a [.mli] and a [.ml], is there a > simple way to access the underlying implementation without having to > reparse [m_code]? What do you mean by access ? do you want a link to a html page of the code ? And what do you mean by "reparse the [m_code]" ? Regards, Maxence