From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <jonathandeanharrop@googlemail.com>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled 
	version=3.1.3
X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82])
	by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70683BBAF
	for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Fri,  5 Sep 2008 23:46:08 +0200 (CEST)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AswBAABFwUhKfU4blWdsb2JhbACCMY9IPgEBAQEJAwoHD50PhnMBAg
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.32,342,1217800800"; 
   d="scan'208";a="16887530"
Received: from ey-out-2122.google.com ([74.125.78.27])
  by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 05 Sep 2008 23:46:08 +0200
Received: by ey-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 6so239984eyi.15
        for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Fri, 05 Sep 2008 14:46:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:organization:to:subject:date
         :user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id:from;
        bh=txVSyBF/p4mt82DOA/LBw3WSBC+Cibmj2vwu7Sw8OEQ=;
        b=boGDf3aFpgbdOxXsJr58cCJ88QQ08n2LidePYqqKg62yomLvNwXL4h7r2XWJOjQ7Xn
         AheCAPItOXB4XZy93y2jg3qF9y3fRpshUBZQLHGqxCU+cPba2u1bEH/p9f0h6nrtwGSe
         nlFvPQ99rJMOUYf6CQEZaRiejwFPJID20g8fU=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
        h=organization:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to
         :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding
         :content-disposition:message-id:from;
        b=bB89eICG6AZyEjv5wqSBp04bC9iU1IKW1IM9qwl5/fAJX3pPVEIsPqpn0E6NFzGl/p
         Q+qojdCqrboGSsm0hTg1TTWvLkvdVS7AwP5HHGMeJy1q0ddvOSBbB3ObaRZSnBXRELc6
         QgAeTPkRj061Nb/rr02cm4sMkVrf7wHcf4lCA=
Received: by 10.210.21.6 with SMTP id 6mr1937242ebu.184.1220651167730;
        Fri, 05 Sep 2008 14:46:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from leper.local ( [86.140.183.215])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p10sm1484589gvf.7.2008.09.05.14.46.06
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);
        Fri, 05 Sep 2008 14:46:07 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd.
To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Native code compile time question
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2008 23:46:07 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9
Cc: Basile STARYNKEVITCH <basile@starynkevitch.net>,
	Raj Bandyopadhyay <rajb@rice.edu>
References: <48C15DA2.6060800@rice.edu> <48C1A56C.4090401@starynkevitch.net>
In-Reply-To: <48C1A56C.4090401@starynkevitch.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200809052346.07765.jon@ffconsultancy.com>
From: Jon Harrop <jonathandeanharrop@googlemail.com>
X-Spam: no; 0.00; basile:01 ocaml:01 fwiw:01 ocaml:01 bindings:01 frog:98 wrote:01 compile:01 caml-list:01 native:03 langage:03 depends:04 generating:09 stuff:09 consider:09 

On Friday 05 September 2008 22:32:28 Basile STARYNKEVITCH wrote:
> It depends of your langage and of the code you are generating, but maybe
> Ocaml is not the right tool for that. Did you consider stuff like LLVM
> http://llvm.org...

FWIW: LLVM and its OCaml bindings are absolutely superb.

-- 
Dr Jon Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd.
http://www.ffconsultancy.com/?e