From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21C85BBAF for ; Tue, 14 Oct 2008 23:33:04 +0200 (CEST) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AsoBACet9EhDWxLCbmdsb2JhbACBcpFtPqwGgWs X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.33,410,1220220000"; d="scan'208";a="18105566" Received: from ip67-91-18-194.z18-91-67.customer.algx.net (HELO server1.bertec.net) ([67.91.18.194]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 14 Oct 2008 23:33:03 +0200 Received: from kuba.bertec.net (kuba.bertec.net [192.168.2.16]) by server1.bertec.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B152C105761 for ; Tue, 14 Oct 2008 17:33:01 -0400 (EDT) From: Kuba Ober To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Road to native windows OCaml... Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 17:32:58 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <200810131935.53365.kuba@mareimbrium.org> <5b0248170810131647u2f89d6b3sfe81c48eab06ead@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5b0248170810131647u2f89d6b3sfe81c48eab06ead@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200810141733.00108.kuba@mareimbrium.org> X-Spam: no; 0.00; ocaml:01 ocaml:01 masm:01 masm:01 unixes:01 gcc:01 cheers:01 seo:98 wrote:01 caml-list:01 output:02 native:03 executable:03 exists:05 gas:92 On Monday 13 October 2008, Seo Sanghyeon wrote: > 2008/10/14 Kuba Ober : > > 2. I need to get OCaml to use nasm instead of masm. I would go as far > > as completely pruning any masm references from OCaml -- there is just > > no need for masm when a good, free alternative exists. nasm is a single > > standalone executable -- you can't get much better than that. Heck, it > > works on unixes too, so it could be used on all platforms. gas is > > horrible too -- it's only raison-d'etre is to process output from gcc. > > nasm is x86-only, so it couldn't be used on all platforms. masm is too, right? I'm looking for a free replacement to masm/gas on x86. Cheers, Kuba