From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id B27B6BBAF for ; Wed, 15 Oct 2008 16:32:58 +0200 (CEST) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: As4BAIOb9UhDWxLCbmdsb2JhbACBcpFuPq1YgWs X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.33,416,1220220000"; d="scan'208";a="18768490" Received: from ip67-91-18-194.z18-91-67.customer.algx.net (HELO server1.bertec.net) ([67.91.18.194]) by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 15 Oct 2008 16:32:58 +0200 Received: from kuba.bertec.net (kuba.bertec.net [192.168.2.16]) by server1.bertec.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B94B9105761 for ; Wed, 15 Oct 2008 10:32:57 -0400 (EDT) From: Kuba Ober To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Road to native windows OCaml... Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 10:32:55 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <200810131935.53365.kuba@mareimbrium.org> <200810150838.55095.kuba@mareimbrium.org> <5b0248170810150604i5cbd339eh377af839e809ec4e@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5b0248170810150604i5cbd339eh377af839e809ec4e@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200810151032.56539.kuba@mareimbrium.org> X-Spam: no; 0.00; ocaml:01 cheers:01 seo:98 wrote:01 caml-list:01 native:03 scope:04 probably:07 bit:11 usually:13 enough:14 october:16 wednesday:17 then:17 don't:19 On Wednesday 15 October 2008, Seo Sanghyeon wrote: > 2008/10/15 Kuba Ober : > > For ia64, I don't care much, and if DDK provides masm-x64 then that's > > probably good enough. > > x64 usually means x86_64, not ia64. Even so, 64 bit is out of my scope at this moment. Cheers, Kuba