From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33941BBAF for ; Wed, 15 Oct 2008 18:27:40 +0200 (CEST) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: As4BAO+29UhDWxLCbmdsb2JhbACBcpFuPq4FgWs X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.33,417,1220220000"; d="scan'208";a="16120245" Received: from ip67-91-18-194.z18-91-67.customer.algx.net (HELO server1.bertec.net) ([67.91.18.194]) by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 15 Oct 2008 18:27:39 +0200 Received: from kuba.bertec.net (kuba.bertec.net [192.168.2.16]) by server1.bertec.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4878105761 for ; Wed, 15 Oct 2008 12:27:38 -0400 (EDT) From: Kuba Ober To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Native win32 OCaml: recap Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 12:27:37 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <200810151042.10524.kuba@mareimbrium.org> In-Reply-To: <200810151042.10524.kuba@mareimbrium.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200810151227.38189.kuba@mareimbrium.org> X-Spam: no; 0.00; ocaml:01 ocamlopt:01 masm:01 masm:01 cheers:01 studios:98 wrote:01 caml-list:01 assembler:02 native:03 instead:14 problems:16 october:16 use:16 use:16 On Wednesday 15 October 2008, Kuba Ober wrote: > 6. ocamlopt can use either ml or masm for assembler; ml comes with > recent Visual Studios. When ml is not present, it would be good > to have it use nasm instead. Replying to myself: ml == masm, and ml is present in all VS 2008 SP1, including Express, so no problems there and no need for nasm. Cheers, Kuba