Re: [Caml-list] OCaml version 3.11.0+beta1

[Stefano Zacchiroli <zack@upsilon.cc>]

On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 05:04:46PM +0200, Alain Frisch wrote:
> Andres Varon wrote:
>> Thanks for the good work. I would like to know exactly what  
>> architectures support the native Dynlink? I did not see this 
>> information in the release notes.
> The native Dynlink is known to work under Linux x86, Linux AMD64, Win32  
> (mingw/msvc ports). It has been lightly tested under Win64, some flavors  
> of BSDs and also the Cygwin port.

[ Sorry for being lazy to check by myself, but apparently the question
  is of wide-interest. ]

Is that something that packagers should worry about or not? I mean,
the specific modules/libraries/... are already detected by configure
and not built/installed/... on architectures missing them or should we
(packages) enforce that?

Many thanks in advance (and for native Dynlink of course :-))!
Cheers.

-- 
Stefano Zacchiroli -*- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7
zack@{upsilon.cc,pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} -<>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/
Dietro un grande uomo c'è sempre /oo\ All one has to do is hit the right
uno zaino        -- A.Bergonzoni \__/ keys at the right time -- J.S.Bach