From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE, DNS_FROM_SECURITYSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 887A8BBAF for ; Mon, 20 Oct 2008 15:35:27 +0200 (CEST) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ag4CADAm/EhDWxLCYGdsb2JhbACBcpFxHiqndYUYX4Ns X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.33,451,1220220000"; d="scan'208";a="18955889" Received: from ip67-91-18-194.z18-91-67.customer.algx.net (HELO server1.bertec.net) ([67.91.18.194]) by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 20 Oct 2008 15:35:27 +0200 Received: from kuba.bertec.net (kuba.bertec.net [192.168.2.16]) by server1.bertec.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0093105761 for ; Mon, 20 Oct 2008 09:35:24 -0400 (EDT) From: Kuba Ober To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Camelia progress, indenter Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 09:35:22 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <200810170956.00776.kuba@mareimbrium.org> <200810200901.14331.kuba@mareimbrium.org> <1224508949.6319.58.camel@Blefuscu> In-Reply-To: <1224508949.6319.58.camel@Blefuscu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200810200935.24152.ober.14@osu.edu> X-Spam: no; 0.00; ocaml:01 compilation:01 debugger:01 cheers:01 parsing:01 caml-list:01 executable:03 generated:05 debug:05 osu:07 probably:07 mean:08 i'm:09 file:11 but:14 > I'm not sure that parsing ocamlbuild file is the right thing to do. For > a simple OCaml project (which would probably mean most Camelia > projects), there are no OCamlBuild files at all. > > Mmmhhh.... there's .itarget (i.e. a list of files you wish generated > after compilation), but that's about it. And, again, most projects don't > have any. OK, so I'll focuse on .itarget instead, since that's the thing that the debugger has to cooperate with to decide what executable to run and debug. Cheers, Kuba