From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,DNS_FROM_SECURITYSAGE, SPF_FAIL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABE08BBAF for ; Tue, 21 Oct 2008 18:57:46 +0200 (CEST) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApoEAPim/UjUbm3S/2dsb2JhbADGToNQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.33,458,1220220000"; d="scan'208";a="30587921" Received: from stirner.roentgeninstitut.de ([212.110.109.210]) by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with SMTP; 21 Oct 2008 18:57:46 +0200 Received: (qmail 31121 invoked by uid 1000); 21 Oct 2008 09:57:44 -0700 Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 09:57:44 -0700 From: Christian Stork To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] What does Jane Street use/want for an IDE? What about you? Message-ID: <20081021165744.GA29133@stirner.roentgeninstitut.de> Mail-Followup-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr References: <200810200919.41561.ober.14@osu.edu> <20081020133711.GP14123@janestcapital.com> <9722eaea0810200705x50c51160p91f740a806f7ab15@mail.gmail.com> <48FCA79E.7090607@flux.utah.edu> <20081020201522.GA13893@annexia.org> <48FD0E16.9030404@flux.utah.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <48FD0E16.9030404@flux.utah.edu> X-Archive: encrypt User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-Spam: no; 0.00; haskell:01 haskell:01 morelli:01 emacs:01 20,:98 plagued:98 806:98 021:98 wrote:01 caml-list:01 caml-list:01 tex:01 tex:01 off-topic:02 latex:02 (I know it's off-topic, but anyway...) You should be happy to find out about Yi, an editor written in Haskell: http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/Yi On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 05:02:46PM -0600, Robert Morelli wrote: ... > PS: Almost exactly the same pattern of poor quality and glacially slow > development has plagued the TeX/LaTeX > world over the past few decades and I believe the issue is the same. If > anything, the foundations of TeX are > even worse than of Emacs. That's another place where someone with an > understanding of modern language > design could make an enormous contribution. I wholeheartetly agree and think of this each time I use TeX! -- Chris Stork <> Support eff.org! <> http://www.ics.uci.edu/~cstork/ OpenPGP fingerprint: B08B 602C C806 C492 D069 021E 41F3 8C8D 50F9 CA2F