caml-list - the Caml user's mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kuba Ober <ober.14@osu.edu>
To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] WideStudio
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 09:12:13 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200811100912.14939.ober.14@osu.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200811071623.22910.jon@ffconsultancy.com>

On Friday 07 November 2008, Jon Harrop wrote:
> I was just perusing SourceForge and stumbled upon a popular software
> package classed as being written partly in OCaml called WideStudio:
>
>   http://www.widestudio.org
>
> This is apparently a cross platform IDE with a GUI toolkit that supports
> several languages including OCaml.
>
> Has anyone heard of or used this?

They use a me-too application framework, which is an achievement in itself --
a lot of work went into it, and it is cross-platform.

They do have a "solid" history of source tarball releases, but their CVS
repository has been created in 2006 and left untouched since. Perhaps they
use internal source control, but that's quite unkosher for such a project.

I've downloaded the sources to see how they are. It seems that "mechanical"
porting to Qt would delete 30%+ code (tens of thousands of lines), and
further refactoring would perhaps slash it all by 50% total. If I were
optimistic, given a good design groundwork, a reduction by 2/3rds of the code
size would not be unthinkable.

The codebase compiles using a C++ compiler and would be typical of a WINAPI or
X11-era mindset. It reads like MFC source code, style-wise. I'd imagine it
to be a major pain to work with if you're "spoiled" with C++, as opposed to
"C/C++", which is neither C nor real C++.

Some of their features may be worth replicating, but I wouldn't go near that
codebase with a long stick, simply because it has bitrotted in spite of being
actively maintained. Their design has bitrotted, that is.

I can't of course convince anyone of choosing vaporware (in-progress Camelia)
over a project that's obviously maintained and has some userbase ;) The above
are just my opinions.

Cheers, Kuba


      reply	other threads:[~2008-11-10 14:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-11-07 16:23 WideStudio Jon Harrop
2008-11-10 14:12 ` Kuba Ober [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200811100912.14939.ober.14@osu.edu \
    --to=ober.14@osu.edu \
    --cc=caml-list@yquem.inria.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).