From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3C85BB84 for ; Sun, 23 Nov 2008 11:32:06 +0100 (CET) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgYDAP6+KElDz4HegWdsb2JhbACTXAEBFiK6YYJ8 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.33,653,1220220000"; d="scan'208";a="17503305" Received: from fettunta.fettunta.org ([67.207.129.222]) by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 23 Nov 2008 11:32:06 +0100 Received: from usha.takhisis.invalid (unknown [10.17.0.18]) by fettunta.fettunta.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF8A318241 for ; Sun, 23 Nov 2008 10:32:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by usha.takhisis.invalid (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B31C86875; Sun, 23 Nov 2008 11:32:01 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 11:32:01 +0100 From: Stefano Zacchiroli To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Wanted: your feedback on the hierarchy of OCaml Batteries Included Message-ID: <20081123103201.GC27327@usha.takhisis.invalid> References: <1227002178.6170.25.camel@Blefuscu> <20081118100625.GA25627@annexia.org> <421532A1-E2CA-404F-8387-E11DA9B3DE79@erratique.ch> <1227010539.6170.72.camel@Blefuscu> <20081118123231.GA15110@annexia.org> <20081119133805.GC1646@usha.takhisis.invalid> <20081119173751.GA10376@annexia.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20081119173751.GA10376@annexia.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Spam: no; 0.00; zacchiroli:01 zack:01 ocaml:01 zacchiroli:01 postdoc:01 zack:01 dietro:98 c'e:98 sempre:98 wrote:01 uno:98 pps:01 caml-list:01 jussieu:01 modules:02 On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 05:37:51PM +0000, Richard Jones wrote: > > Regarding the advantages see my previous post, where I put some > > motivations. Regarding the difficulties of moving modules around, how > > harder is than moving a module around when you have no hierarchy? > Well I guess what I _meant_ to say was that if your modules aren't in > a hierarchy to start with, then you won't be tempted to move them > around the hierarchy :-) ... which sounds like cheating :) -- Stefano Zacchiroli -o- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7 zack@{upsilon.cc,pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} -<>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/ Dietro un grande uomo c'è ..| . |. Et ne m'en veux pas si je te tutoie sempre uno zaino ...........| ..: |.... Je dis tu à tous ceux que j'aime