From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,SPF_FAIL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35559BBAF for ; Fri, 19 Dec 2008 22:27:53 +0100 (CET) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.36,250,1228086000"; d="scan'208";a="32904894" Received: from discorde.inria.fr ([192.93.2.38]) by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 19 Dec 2008 22:27:53 +0100 Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82]) by discorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id mBJLRqYR031494 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=OK) for ; Fri, 19 Dec 2008 22:27:52 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ak4DAEagS0lQRFuwgWdsb2JhbACTZQEBFiKqCFiQZYMD X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.36,250,1228086000"; d="scan'208";a="21542207" Received: from furbychan.cocan.org ([80.68.91.176]) by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA; 19 Dec 2008 22:27:52 +0100 Received: from rich by furbychan.cocan.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1LDmsv-00080K-TT; Fri, 19 Dec 2008 21:27:49 +0000 Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 21:27:49 +0000 To: Oliver Bandel Cc: OCaml Subject: Re: [Caml-list] More cores Message-ID: <20081219212747.GA30594@annexia.org> References: <1229719052.494c060c9d36d@webmail.in-berlin.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1229719052.494c060c9d36d@webmail.in-berlin.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) From: Richard Jones X-Miltered: at discorde with ID 494C11D8.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; 0100,:01 bandel:01 ocaml:01 ocaml:01 wrote:01 oliver:01 caml-list:01 motivation:02 programming:03 compiled:04 fri:05 dec:05 installed:05 discussion:06 red:92 On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 09:37:32PM +0100, Oliver Bandel wrote: [...] > P.S.: During the last multicore discussion, I found that link, > but had not tried OCamlp3l. Now I think I will have more > time and motivation and it could be compiled and installed > without any problems with OCaml 3.10.2. Has anyone tried it with 3.11? I had an idea to try out some fork-based OCaml programming to exploit the 4 & 8 core machines we have here, but maybe can try this instead. Rich. -- Richard Jones Red Hat