From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72862BB84 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 05:51:17 +0100 (CET) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.37,257,1231110000"; d="scan'208";a="22375908" Received: from concorde.inria.fr ([192.93.2.39]) by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 13 Jan 2009 05:51:17 +0100 Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id n0D4pG0F010932 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 05:51:17 +0100 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.37,257,1231110000"; d="scan'208";a="22375906" Received: from yquem.inria.fr ([128.93.8.37]) by mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 13 Jan 2009 05:51:16 +0100 Received: by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix, from userid 25991) id BFD95BB84; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 05:51:16 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 05:51:16 +0100 From: Daniel de Rauglaudre To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: caml_alloc + 64 bits - caml_alloc.h Message-ID: <20090113045116.GA646@yquem.inria.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 496C1DC4.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; rauglaudre:01 rauglaudre:01 alloc:01 alloc:01 compilation:01 stub:01 ocaml:01 morality:98 caml:02 caml:02 segmentation:03 daniel:04 daniel:04 fault:04 raises:05 Hi everybody, Possibly useful information. Is it already known? When using calls to "caml_alloc" in a 64 bits architecture without having included "caml/alloc.h", it raises "Segmentation fault" at execution time. Notice that I got no warning at compilation time for using caml_alloc without a definition stub. In 32 bits architecture, I never had any problem with that. Morality: Don't forget to #include "caml/alloc.h" in your C programs if you alloc OCaml things! -- Daniel de Rauglaudre http://pauillac.inria.fr/~ddr/