From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 101C5BB84 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 06:15:33 +0100 (CET) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.37,257,1231110000"; d="scan'208";a="21396221" Received: from concorde.inria.fr ([192.93.2.39]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 13 Jan 2009 06:15:32 +0100 Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id n0D5FWnZ011347 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 06:15:32 +0100 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.37,257,1231110000"; d="scan'208";a="19507698" Received: from yquem.inria.fr ([128.93.8.37]) by mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 13 Jan 2009 06:15:31 +0100 Received: by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix, from userid 25991) id 02298BB84; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 06:15:32 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 06:15:31 +0100 From: Daniel de Rauglaudre To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] caml_alloc + 64 bits - caml_alloc.h Message-ID: <20090113051531.GB646@yquem.inria.fr> References: <20090113045116.GA646@yquem.inria.fr> <20090113155810.de52852c.mle+ocaml@mega-nerd.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090113155810.de52852c.mle+ocaml@mega-nerd.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 496C2374.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; rauglaudre:01 rauglaudre:01 alloc:01 alloc:01 gcc:01 gcc:01 2009:98 wrote:01 caml-list:01 caml:02 caml:02 seems:03 erik:04 daniel:04 daniel:04 On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 03:58:10PM +1100, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > If you are using GCC, GCC can warn you if you use the > -Wmissing-prototypes warning flag. Hmm... does not work. The correct option seems to be -Wimplicit-function-declaration -- Daniel de Rauglaudre http://pauillac.inria.fr/~ddr/