From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCE64BBAF for ; Fri, 23 Jan 2009 15:42:49 +0100 (CET) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AqwCAEdmeUlDz4HegWdsb2JhbACTfgEBFiK4HoVz X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.37,312,1231110000"; d="scan'208";a="21930756" Received: from fettunta.fettunta.org ([67.207.129.222]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 23 Jan 2009 15:42:49 +0100 Received: from usha.takhisis.invalid (unknown [10.17.0.10]) by fettunta.fettunta.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FEEF1814D for ; Fri, 23 Jan 2009 14:42:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by usha.takhisis.invalid (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 03685609E; Fri, 23 Jan 2009 15:42:27 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 15:42:27 +0100 From: Stefano Zacchiroli To: Caml-list List Subject: Re: [Caml-list] OCaml and PETSc Message-ID: <20090123144227.GA27540@usha.takhisis.invalid> Mail-Followup-To: Caml-list List References: <4978C484.6040001@soton.ac.uk> <20090123132008.GB32545@annexia.org> <4979CF93.3060908@soton.ac.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <4979CF93.3060908@soton.ac.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Spam: no; 0.00; zacchiroli:01 zack:01 ocaml:01 cheers:01 zacchiroli:01 postdoc:01 zack:01 23,:98 2009:98 dietro:98 c'e:98 sempre:98 wrote:01 uno:98 pps:01 On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 02:09:23PM +0000, Dr. Thomas Fischbacher wrote: >> Is there no maintained upstream source for Pycaml? I noticed the >> other day that Coccinelle is also shipping Pycaml, and their version >> doesn't work with Python 2.6 (potential patch attached). > > We repeatedly tried to contact the author (Art), but did not succeed. > So, in the end, we just adopted and extended it. Thanks for that! Still, instead of embedding your extensions within coccinelle, what about maintaining it (or at least realising it once) as the separate project it deserves to be? I've kind of a deja-vu with this, with someone else in the past taking care for a little while of pycaml, but never reaching the outcome of making a new release taking over its maintenance. Would you be so kind of going forward with that? Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli -o- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7 zack@{upsilon.cc,pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} -<>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/ Dietro un grande uomo c'è ..| . |. Et ne m'en veux pas si je te tutoie sempre uno zaino ...........| ..: |.... Je dis tu à tous ceux que j'aime