From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,SPF_FAIL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7454EBBC4 for ; Thu, 5 Mar 2009 10:09:15 +0100 (CET) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AiUIAHslr0lQRFuwX2dsb2JhbACUdxcLCgQUwmuECAY X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.38,305,1233529200"; d="scan'208";a="23890633" Received: from furbychan.cocan.org ([80.68.91.176]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 05 Mar 2009 10:09:15 +0100 Received: from rich by furbychan.cocan.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Lf9Zq-0006gw-VL; Thu, 05 Mar 2009 09:09:14 +0000 Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 09:09:14 +0000 To: Jon Harrop Cc: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] stl? Message-ID: <20090305090914.GC24055@annexia.org> References: <91a2ba3e0903031340wcdc976cp52522eb35f7ccb73@mail.gmail.com> <200903042007.43232.jon@ffconsultancy.com> <8763ipypx1.fsf@aryx.cs.uiuc.edu> <200903050106.34700.jon@ffconsultancy.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200903050106.34700.jon@ffconsultancy.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) From: Richard Jones X-Spam: no; 0.00; stl:01 ocaml:01 camlp:01 camlp:01 wiki:01 2009:98 wrote:01 caml-list:01 ast:02 output:02 raises:05 thu:05 indeed:07 red:92 reasonably:09 On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 01:06:34AM +0000, Jon Harrop wrote: > Indeed. Which raises the question of how I should put an OCaml front > end onto HLVM... Use the output of camlp4 (the AST). It's reasonably well documented in the camlp4 wiki. Rich. -- Richard Jones Red Hat